Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

Bernardo de La Paz's Journal
Bernardo de La Paz's Journal
December 31, 2021

The higher power can be non-religious, like Love. Love yourself, love others, let love sustain you.


When you feel you "need" a drink, but don't want it or shouldn't have it according to whatever regimen you have chosen, ...

... help yourself then by thinking of love: those you love, love for the wonderful parts of yourself, care for the not-so-wonderful parts (which get better with time), love for the good you accomplish, love for friends, love for country, love for humanity, ...

... love for a bird chirping in the morning.


Don't not-drink as an "obligation" or as a discipline. Don't not-drink because of the negatives which you are well aware of. Don't kick yourself. You've kicked yourself enough.

Not-drink for the positives of not drinking. Not-drink because when you don't drink you have more capacity to give and receive love.

If you fail and have a drink you don't want, that's okay. It's not really failing. Thomas Edison tried a thousand ways to make an electric light bulb and they all failed. When asked by a reporter, he said he was happy because now he knew a thousand ways not to do.

Don't worry about failing. Celebrate the successes of love as they occur and call them to mind from time to time.

December 28, 2021

mRNA vaccines in development for years before Covid. They just replicated the snippet & put it in


So the clinical trials were accelerated, but not by much. And not because of tRump's efforts.


But, critically important, tRump had no workable vaccination plan in place when he left office.

The first human clinical trial using ex vivo dendritic cells transfected with mRNA encoding tumor antigens (therapeutic cancer mRNA vaccine) was started in 2001.[27][28] Four years later, the successful use of modified nucleosides as a method to transport mRNA inside cells without setting off the body's defense system was reported.[27][29] Clinical trial results of an mRNA vaccine directly injected into the body against cancer cells were reported in 2008.[30][31]

BioNTech in 2008 and Moderna in 2010 were founded to develop mRNA biotechnologies.[32][33] The US research agency DARPA launched at this time the biotechnology research program ADEPT to develop emerging technologies for the US military.[34][35] The agency recognized the potential of nucleic acid technology for defense against pandemics and began to invest in the field.[34] DARPA grants were seen as a vote of confidence that in turn encouraged other government agencies and private investors to invest in mRNA technology.[35] DARPA awarded at the time a $25 million grant to Moderna.[36]

The first human clinical trials using an mRNA vaccine against an infectious agent (rabies) began in 2013.[37][38] Over the next few years, clinical trials of mRNA vaccines for a number of other viruses were started. mRNA vaccines for human use have been studied for infectious agents such as influenza,[39] Zika virus, cytomegalovirus, and Chikungunya virus.[40][41]


So if anyone gives you BS about "experimental not-a-vaccine" don't accept it and give them the truth and tell them to do some "basic research, duh", i.e. look it up. Anti-vaxxers are very proud of their pitiful attempts at "research".

December 14, 2021

I felt that about Barr at the time he resigned. Jan 6 was in the future but being talked about


People like me well outside of DC knew something was in the wind. There was chatter on RW sites.

Before the election:

My prediction: Trump will win resoundingly on election night. They will still count mail-in and "newly found" ballots for a month until they declare Biden the winner of "the popular vote". The Electoral College will elect Trump anyway and the Left will be calling for its elimination, as usual.
18 posted on 10/7/2020, by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)


Tweet by tRump Dec 19:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Peter Navarro releases 36-page report
alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient' to swing victory to
Trump https://washex.am/3nwaBCe. A great report by
Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big
protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!


Start gathering at the Supreme Court building and give those pussies in black robes a real scare. A couple of flat bed trucks with gallows built on them would be nice for effect.
38 posted on 12/19/2020, by Colo9250


You have a lot to learn about martial law Grasshopper. Congress won’t
be in session and neither will SCOTUS.
75 posted on 12/19/2020, by Georgia Girl 2


If it isn’t an armed revolt is will be waste of time.
99 posted on 12/19/2020, by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)


emphasis added:
Just speaking hypothetically... How many people would it take to storm the capital?
266 posted on 12/19/2020, by BigEdLB (All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)


Lara Trump Explains How Donald Trump Will Secure Re-Election on January 6, 2021
Dr. Gina, Posted on 12/31/2020,


Trump wants Patriots to show up in Washington on the 6th at 11 am. And it isn’t to all sing Kumbaya. That’s why it’s different.
38 posted on 1/1/2021, by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)


PhiloBedo, in short, we are ready. Most of us support Trump. We have been training for months. Our special forces are on standby. Milley had to say what he said. POTUS rearranged the chain of command for special forces units. He and the SECDEF are letting things play out for now but that will not always be the case. Stay tuned.
143 posted on 1/1/2021, by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17)


There is going to be violence. Antifa and BLM will see to it that is true. And, the media will blame it all on the Proud Boys and Trump supporters.
12 posted on 1/3/2021, by Kazan

They media won't blame anybody if they are the first ones on the list.
20 posted on 1/3/2021, by The Duke (President Trump = America's Last, Best Chance)

They will be the biggest target.
31 posted on 1/3/2021, by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)

POTUS has been itching to invoke the Insurrection Act on these punks. He hasn't done it for political reasons, but after Jan. 6th, he won't be restrained. For events in D.C., he has clear authority to act, take control of the local police, etc.
35 posted on 1/3/2021, by Dr. Franklin
December 14, 2021

The military had multiple reasons to stay out. Esper was fired Nov 9, 2020 for defying tRump in summ


Esper had refused to deploy military on the streets in the summer of 2020, knowing that tRump would only be using it as a prop for his election campaign and using it as a way to create more polarization, hoping "the Left" would go apeshit nuts to create the chaos of "american carnage" that tRump was always making so that he "alone could fix it."

General Milley made it clear at the time and again nearer the election and after that the US military would not intervene on any side in political partisan conflict.

By Nov 9 it was clear that tRump had lost and so Plan A was to pressurize and extort the needed Electoral College votes by hook (threats), book (lawyering), and crook (fraudits). Plan B was to create chaos Jan 6 to stall the EC vote count in Congress and create an antifa-trumpanzee armageddon in Washington and other locations around the country. Antifa wisely kept the f away.

Plan B required Esper out of the way.

Trump fires Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and replaces him with Christopher C. Miller as acting Secretary.[17][18][19][20] In response to the firings, CIA Director Gina Haspel privately tells Chair of the Joint Chiefs Milley that "we are on the way to a right-wing coup".[21]


There was the practice rally Dec 12th that included speakers calling for tRump to invoke the Insurrection Act. It was a test skirmish that saw Proud Boys fighting antifa.

December 19:

Trump announces the January 6 rally on Twitter, stating:

Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"[46][47]


Why January 6th rather than say Jan 14th or Dec 30? We know the answer. And so do the seditionists.

December 12, 2021

Note: you are on about the capitalism-psychology theory of games, not the mathematical one


Capitalism-psychology because it is the art and science of manipulating reward (as you say) for profit. I began by writing psycho-capitalism and almost kept it because in extremis, capitalism is kinda psychotic.

The math one is in its simplest form that there are three types of games: zero-sum, positive-sum, and negative-sum.

Democrats and progressives want the country to work together to make the game positive sum.

RepubliCons think it has to be a zero sum game (somebody's gain is their loss) and so they fight for themselves, their families and their groups (always defending privilege) against the "other". This of course makes the game negative sum if it becomes widespread. "Hands offa MY stack, Jack."


The invisible hand of capitalism requires enlightened self-interest for the rising tide to lift all boats.

December 6, 2021

There's your entry


Every time talk/posts turn political, drop Biden's latest act of decency and just let it sit there. Don't defend it. If he attacks it, repeat it, perhaps in simpler terms, once. Like the deaf girl and the Kennedy Center Honors.

If he drops his guard and says something like, well I guess Biden is more decent than tRump, then he'll qualify it with "sometimes". Just say "You can generally say the same about Ds and Rs." And let it sit there.

Good luck! I don't know. I don't know what would work. Just a goofy idea.

December 5, 2021

If we take that as an absolute then


It would invalidate vaccine mandates and requirements.

So, ying-yang with two dots, and all that, there are very few absolutes, and this is not one of them.

Then we have to ask how and where to draw the line.

I think it becomes a question of public good and innocent victims.

A pregnancy is between a woman and a lover, partner, if there is one and potentially a doctor. The woman gets the veto. It is firstmost and foremost a private matter.

Pandemic contagious illness is a public matter. It could not be farther from a private matter. As a practical matter, the inconvenience and potential side effects (including possibly death) are miniscule in comparison to the side effects of the uncontrolled virus. Even when weighted by rates and severities.

Believing in outlandish theories, as a group, does not give group members the right to infect other people. That in particular means no right to evade the vaccines and carry on regardless.

Their (and our) right to our own bodies is limited because our bodies can invade other bodies (metaphorically) via replicated viruses.

There is an old saying "Your right to swing a fist ends where my nose begins." Failing to take common counter measures against spreading the virus (masks, vaccines) is like swinging a fist. And you can't put all the onus on the nose; the virus is always most effectively stopped inside and at the body replicating and expelling it.

December 4, 2021

Barrett's adopted children taken from Haiti because US children not needy enough?


Or because it is effectively easier to (metaphorically) buy children there?

I don't doubt she has a good part of her heart, because she has as a fact adopted three children. But the rest of it, bless her heart, is at best clouded with some hypocrisy and possible motivations that make you scratch your head.

Barrett implies that with the termination of parental rights, that experience is over.


That's consistent with adopting from a foreign country. Fewer complications from the grieving mother, then or in later years.

{emphasis added:}
At the time, you posted on Facebook, “Anyone notice how Amy Coney Barrett spoke of her biological kids in terms of their intellectual prowess and spoke of her adopted kids about their trauma history? Now this is a prime example of implicit bias. Unconscious racism. This is an example of white saviorism.” It went viral, and you got a lot of abuse.


Wow.
December 4, 2021

In theory & prob should be goal, prosecution is even-handed regardless of the case.


Agressiveness, or rather assiduousness, should be a linear function of the severity of the crime: increasing severity gets increasing assiduousness. "/əˈsɪdʒ.u.əs.nəs/ the quality of showing great care and attention to detail: the assiduousness of his care for her. She approached her job with a rare assiduousness." I think assiduousness is more desirable than aggressiveness which can lead to affairs like the Richard Jewell persecution, when under public pressure cases get warped.

In practice, especially with elected prosecutorial positions, prosecution is going to reflect to some degree the public interest. However, public interest is democratic and is itself a function of the public's chaotically reasoned assessment of the severity. So public interest has a good correlation with the severity of the crime, even when confounding factors like color range come into play.

Those and other confounding factors are a third input to the function that outputs prosecutorial assiduousness.

Public_interest = democracy_function (severity, experience, chaotic_confounding_factors);
Prosecutorial_Assiduousness = government_function (severity, public_interest, confounding_factors);

Severity is key, public interest is democratic and correlated with severity, confounding factors are those which tend to confuse, cloud, and warp the function.

(More generally, the biggest confounding factor to democracy functions and government functions are the profit driven media and self-centered aspects of capitalism, respectively. "But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain)

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Fri Jul 16, 2004, 11:36 PM
Number of posts: 48,986

About Bernardo de La Paz

Canadian who lived for many years in Northern California and left a bit of my heart there. (note to self: https: //images.dailykos.com/images/1043361/original/2016.09.19_sunflowers_header.jpg . https://i.imgur.com/1VKgdmc.jpeg)
Latest Discussions»Bernardo de La Paz's Journal