Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
marmar
marmar's Journal
marmar's Journal
July 13, 2014
from the Atlantic:
Facebook Has All the Power
Media critic Jay Rosen says a controversial mood study shows how few rights and how little control Facebook users actually have.
JULIE POSETTI | JUL 10 2014, 10:49 AM ET
Amid growing calls for formal investigations into Facebook's disturbing mood manipulation research, media scholar Jay Rosen has a reminder for journalists, editors, and personal social media users alike: "Facebook has all the power. You have almost none."
The experiment, conducted without users' knowledge or consent, manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 Facebook users with the purpose of testing mood responses to content alteration.
The Federal Trade Commission is considering two formal complaints about the 2012 Facebook research, published contentiously in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journalone from US Senator Mark Warner and another from the Electronic Privacy Information Centre. Meanwhile, in the UK, the Information Commissioner's Office is investigating.
I caught up with Rosen, who teaches Journalism at NYU and is also an advisor to First Look Media.
.......(snip).......
While we know that Facebook has access to our content and our rights as users are increasingly being diminished, there is something particularly creepy about the knowledge that, without our consent, in an Orwellian fashion, we can be unwitting participants in psychological experimentation. What should this reality signal to Facebook users? Is it time to pull-back?
You have (almost) no rights. You have (almost) no control. You have no idea what they're doing to you or with you. You don't even know who's getting the stuff you are posting, and you're not allowed to know. Trade secret! As the saying goes: "If you're not paying for the product, you are the product." As long as you understand and accept all that, then proceed. With caution. .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/07/facebook-has-all-the-power-you-have-almost-none/374215/
Facebook Has All the Power
from the Atlantic:
Facebook Has All the Power
Media critic Jay Rosen says a controversial mood study shows how few rights and how little control Facebook users actually have.
JULIE POSETTI | JUL 10 2014, 10:49 AM ET
Amid growing calls for formal investigations into Facebook's disturbing mood manipulation research, media scholar Jay Rosen has a reminder for journalists, editors, and personal social media users alike: "Facebook has all the power. You have almost none."
The experiment, conducted without users' knowledge or consent, manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 Facebook users with the purpose of testing mood responses to content alteration.
The Federal Trade Commission is considering two formal complaints about the 2012 Facebook research, published contentiously in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journalone from US Senator Mark Warner and another from the Electronic Privacy Information Centre. Meanwhile, in the UK, the Information Commissioner's Office is investigating.
I caught up with Rosen, who teaches Journalism at NYU and is also an advisor to First Look Media.
.......(snip).......
While we know that Facebook has access to our content and our rights as users are increasingly being diminished, there is something particularly creepy about the knowledge that, without our consent, in an Orwellian fashion, we can be unwitting participants in psychological experimentation. What should this reality signal to Facebook users? Is it time to pull-back?
You have (almost) no rights. You have (almost) no control. You have no idea what they're doing to you or with you. You don't even know who's getting the stuff you are posting, and you're not allowed to know. Trade secret! As the saying goes: "If you're not paying for the product, you are the product." As long as you understand and accept all that, then proceed. With caution. .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/07/facebook-has-all-the-power-you-have-almost-none/374215/
July 12, 2014
from the documentary "The Corporation"
We used to regard many areas as too essential to the public good to be commercialized; they were protected by tradition and regulation. Now, everything is
becoming fair game in the private taking of the commons -- land, oceans, air, water, education, health, energy and social assistance. Where do we draw the line?
The Corporation: The private taking of the commons
from the documentary "The Corporation"
We used to regard many areas as too essential to the public good to be commercialized; they were protected by tradition and regulation. Now, everything is
becoming fair game in the private taking of the commons -- land, oceans, air, water, education, health, energy and social assistance. Where do we draw the line?
July 12, 2014
http://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/drone_swatting_20140711
Fly swatter in 21st century America (cartoon)
http://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/drone_swatting_20140711
July 12, 2014
NRA News commentator Dom Raso compares gun control to racist Jim Crow laws
NRA News commentator Dom Raso recently compared laws to regulate guns to laws that enforced segregation and outlawed interracial marriage.
Raso, a U.S. Navy SEAL veteran, said in a video uploaded to YouTube on Sunday that gun control laws were like Jim Crow laws because owning and carrying a firearm was a civil right.
Just because someone makes a law that says you cant buy, own, or carry a weapon doesnt make it lawful, he remarked. Jim Crow laws were also passed and enforced and those were equally unconstitutional.
Too many Americans dont think of the Second Amendment as a civil rights issue, Raso continued. And thats dangerous, because all of those rights together define freedom. If youre free to speak but not worship, youre not free. If youre free to vote, but not to speak, you arent not free either.
And if youre free to do everything but defend yourself with a firearm, youre not going to feel very free when youre holding the phone waiting on the cops to save you from a home invader. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/08/nra-news-commentator-dom-raso-compares-gun-control-to-racist-jim-crow-laws/
Sweet Jeezus......NRA goes off the deep end.....again.
NRA News commentator Dom Raso compares gun control to racist Jim Crow laws
NRA News commentator Dom Raso recently compared laws to regulate guns to laws that enforced segregation and outlawed interracial marriage.
Raso, a U.S. Navy SEAL veteran, said in a video uploaded to YouTube on Sunday that gun control laws were like Jim Crow laws because owning and carrying a firearm was a civil right.
Just because someone makes a law that says you cant buy, own, or carry a weapon doesnt make it lawful, he remarked. Jim Crow laws were also passed and enforced and those were equally unconstitutional.
Too many Americans dont think of the Second Amendment as a civil rights issue, Raso continued. And thats dangerous, because all of those rights together define freedom. If youre free to speak but not worship, youre not free. If youre free to vote, but not to speak, you arent not free either.
And if youre free to do everything but defend yourself with a firearm, youre not going to feel very free when youre holding the phone waiting on the cops to save you from a home invader. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/08/nra-news-commentator-dom-raso-compares-gun-control-to-racist-jim-crow-laws/
July 12, 2014
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/seattles_first_marijuana_shop_runs_out_of_stock_20140711
The first and only recreation pot store in the Evergreen state was forced to close on Friday after running out of stock just three days after Washington became the second U.S. state to allow pot sales to adults. But Seattleites shouldnt fret. The shop is set to re-open soon.
Reuters reports via the Guardian:
Grow It and They Will Come
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/seattles_first_marijuana_shop_runs_out_of_stock_20140711
The first and only recreation pot store in the Evergreen state was forced to close on Friday after running out of stock just three days after Washington became the second U.S. state to allow pot sales to adults. But Seattleites shouldnt fret. The shop is set to re-open soon.
Reuters reports via the Guardian:
Cannabis City opened in Seattle on Tuesday with at least 4.5kg (10 pounds) of marijuana for sale, and by close of business on Thursday it was all gone. A message on the stores phone line said it would re-open on 21 July.
There were widespread concerns that shortages of pot would afflict retailers this week after the state issued its first 25 licences to outlets, under a heavily regulated and taxed system approved by voters in November 2012.
Some business owners planned to limit the amount of marijuana early customers could buy to try to make stocks last.
July 12, 2014
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/air_travel_is_getting_more_aggravating_and_complicated_20140711
More stratified levels of service, workers who are underpaid and overworked, and a climate that is increasingly hostile to human activitythe experience of privatized air travel worldwide is rapidly deteriorating. Journalist Scott Smith lists six ways how.
Smith writes at Quartz:
Air Travel Is Getting More Aggravating and Complicated
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/air_travel_is_getting_more_aggravating_and_complicated_20140711
More stratified levels of service, workers who are underpaid and overworked, and a climate that is increasingly hostile to human activitythe experience of privatized air travel worldwide is rapidly deteriorating. Journalist Scott Smith lists six ways how.
Smith writes at Quartz:
1. Climate change-driven travel breakdown
The weather was at the center of the issue, and air travel authorities took some pre-emptive action to avoid worse problems. However, the conditions that are throwing more turbulent thunderstorms, snow, early hurricanes, dustin short stirring the atmosphere more violently due to increased surface heating, shifting weather patterns and other consequences of climate changeare going to get worse over coming decades, according to scientists. Expect bumpier flights, more diversions and delays, and the higher costs that come with them in the future, particularly in the coastal and southern regions of the US where population is growing while flight schedules are generally shrinking.
2. Overworked and understaffed airlines
With the boom in consolidation among US air carriers have come some inevitable staffing cuts. Skift reported last year that US DOT data showed a net decline in airline employment over the past decade, even as costs have gone up and service quality declined. American (the most recent culprit for me) has cut staff by over 8% in the past year as it pushed for its merger with USAirways. Evidence on the ground, taking the form of a boom in self-service kiosks in airports, signals an industry strategy of pushing out more human interaction in favor of technology.
Unfortunately, these fairly dumb devices arent equipped to deal with anything other than the basic flight reservation modification and check-in. So they cant support hundreds of stranded or delayed travelers staring at unmanned desks, as some of Americans lines at LaGuardia were in my situation. The same goes with the rental car industry, also moving to greater use of automated agent kiosks to deal with customers, which again, fail to offer ways to deal with non-standard situations.
July 12, 2014
By Eva Galperin and Nadia Kayyali via EFF
Imagine that you watched a police officer in your neighborhood stop ten completely ordinary people every day just to take a look inside their vehicle or backpack. Now imagine that nine of those people are never even accused of a crime. They just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Even the most law-abiding person would eventually protest this treatment. In factthey have.
Now replace police officers with the NSA. The scenario above is what the NSA is doing with our communications, under cover of its twisted interpretation of Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act. The Washington Post has revealed that Nine of 10 account holders found in a large cache of intercepted conversations, which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided in full to The Post, were not the intended surveillance targets. Additionally, nearly half of the surveillance files, a strikingly high proportion, contained names, e-mail addresses or other details that the NSA marked as belonging to U.S. citizens or residents.
The thousands of pages of documents that provide that basis for the article are not raw content. Rather, as Barton Gellman, one of the authors of the article states in a follow up published several days later states: Everything in the sample we analyzed had been evaluated by NSA analysts in Hawaii, pulled from the agencys central repositories and minimized by hand after automated efforts to screen out U.S. identities.
What that means is that if youre on the Internet, youre in the NSAs neighborhoodwhether you are in the U.S. or not. And like those who protest unjust policies like stop and frisk in their cities, you should be protesting this treatment. ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2014/07/spying-its-personal.html
NSA Spying: Now It’s Personal
By Eva Galperin and Nadia Kayyali via EFF
Imagine that you watched a police officer in your neighborhood stop ten completely ordinary people every day just to take a look inside their vehicle or backpack. Now imagine that nine of those people are never even accused of a crime. They just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Even the most law-abiding person would eventually protest this treatment. In factthey have.
Now replace police officers with the NSA. The scenario above is what the NSA is doing with our communications, under cover of its twisted interpretation of Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act. The Washington Post has revealed that Nine of 10 account holders found in a large cache of intercepted conversations, which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided in full to The Post, were not the intended surveillance targets. Additionally, nearly half of the surveillance files, a strikingly high proportion, contained names, e-mail addresses or other details that the NSA marked as belonging to U.S. citizens or residents.
The thousands of pages of documents that provide that basis for the article are not raw content. Rather, as Barton Gellman, one of the authors of the article states in a follow up published several days later states: Everything in the sample we analyzed had been evaluated by NSA analysts in Hawaii, pulled from the agencys central repositories and minimized by hand after automated efforts to screen out U.S. identities.
What that means is that if youre on the Internet, youre in the NSAs neighborhoodwhether you are in the U.S. or not. And like those who protest unjust policies like stop and frisk in their cities, you should be protesting this treatment. ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2014/07/spying-its-personal.html
July 12, 2014
By Juan Cole
Is anyone else disgusted by the propaganda trick of trying to get Americans to sympathize with Israels massive attack on the civilian habitations of Gaza by saying if the US was subjected to rocket fire by X [usually Mexicans], what would it do?
This hope that Americans are racists and that their racism can be incited against the Palestinians is about the lowest rhetorical trick you could imagine.
Im old enough to remember the race riots in American cities of the late 1960s and early 1970s. I can remember a prominent pro-Israel columnist for the Washington Post, way back then, explicitly comparing Palestinians protesting their occupation by Israel to African-Americans protesting their economic marginalization. The writers hope was that white Americans would identify with Israelis and come to see Palestinians as Black. Or, lets face it, as the N-word.
Someone recently sent to my blog such a screed, saying, what if rockets from Quebec were slamming into Maine?
The comparison is not only repulsive because the author hopes that Americans are Anglo-Saxons who dont like French Canadians (or French anything). Notice no one says What if the white people of Windsor, Ontario, were sending rockets across the Detroit River onto Detroit? That would get the race dynamics that the analogy is aiming at all wrong. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2014/07/rockets-assumes-colonial.html
Juan Cole: Stop Saying ‘If X Fired Rockets at U.S.’: It’s Racist, and Assumes We’re Colonial
By Juan Cole
Is anyone else disgusted by the propaganda trick of trying to get Americans to sympathize with Israels massive attack on the civilian habitations of Gaza by saying if the US was subjected to rocket fire by X [usually Mexicans], what would it do?
This hope that Americans are racists and that their racism can be incited against the Palestinians is about the lowest rhetorical trick you could imagine.
Im old enough to remember the race riots in American cities of the late 1960s and early 1970s. I can remember a prominent pro-Israel columnist for the Washington Post, way back then, explicitly comparing Palestinians protesting their occupation by Israel to African-Americans protesting their economic marginalization. The writers hope was that white Americans would identify with Israelis and come to see Palestinians as Black. Or, lets face it, as the N-word.
Someone recently sent to my blog such a screed, saying, what if rockets from Quebec were slamming into Maine?
The comparison is not only repulsive because the author hopes that Americans are Anglo-Saxons who dont like French Canadians (or French anything). Notice no one says What if the white people of Windsor, Ontario, were sending rockets across the Detroit River onto Detroit? That would get the race dynamics that the analogy is aiming at all wrong. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2014/07/rockets-assumes-colonial.html
July 12, 2014
The fraud scheme began to unravel last fall, with the discovery of a misdirected stack of bogus prescriptions and a suspicious spike in Medicare drug spending tied to a doctor in Key Biscayne, Fla.
Now its led to two guilty pleas, as well as an ongoing criminal case against a pharmacy owner.
Last year, ProPublica chronicled how lax oversight had led to rampant waste and fraud in Medicares prescription drug program, known as Part D. As part of that series, we wrote about Dr. Carmen Ortiz-Butcher, a kidney specialist whose Part D prescriptions soared from $282,000 in 2010 to $4 million the following year. The value of her prescriptions rose to nearly $5 million in 2012, the most recent year available.
But no one in Medicare bothered to ask her about the seemingly huge change in her practice, Ortiz-Butchers attorney said. She stumbled across a sign of trouble last September, after asking a staffer to mail a fanny pack to her brother. But instead of receiving the pack, he received a package of prescriptions purportedly signed by the doctor, lawyer Robert Mayer said last year. Ortiz-Butcher immediately alerted authorities. .................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/fanny_pack_mixup_unravels_massive_medicare_fraud_scheme_20140712
Fanny Pack Mixup Unravels Massive Medicare Fraud Scheme
This piece originally ran on ProPublica.
The fraud scheme began to unravel last fall, with the discovery of a misdirected stack of bogus prescriptions and a suspicious spike in Medicare drug spending tied to a doctor in Key Biscayne, Fla.
Now its led to two guilty pleas, as well as an ongoing criminal case against a pharmacy owner.
Last year, ProPublica chronicled how lax oversight had led to rampant waste and fraud in Medicares prescription drug program, known as Part D. As part of that series, we wrote about Dr. Carmen Ortiz-Butcher, a kidney specialist whose Part D prescriptions soared from $282,000 in 2010 to $4 million the following year. The value of her prescriptions rose to nearly $5 million in 2012, the most recent year available.
But no one in Medicare bothered to ask her about the seemingly huge change in her practice, Ortiz-Butchers attorney said. She stumbled across a sign of trouble last September, after asking a staffer to mail a fanny pack to her brother. But instead of receiving the pack, he received a package of prescriptions purportedly signed by the doctor, lawyer Robert Mayer said last year. Ortiz-Butcher immediately alerted authorities. .................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/fanny_pack_mixup_unravels_massive_medicare_fraud_scheme_20140712
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHometown: Detroit, MI
Member since: Fri Oct 29, 2004, 12:18 AM
Number of posts: 77,072