Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

MrMickeysMom's Journal
MrMickeysMom's Journal
December 26, 2015

Okay... How did THIS get fucked up today?

Here's the picture from DU's home page sidebar, subject line, "Other Governments in Space" -


However, here's the actual Video OP -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017317458

One had nothing to do with the other, but someone can somehow insert this picture.... and for what purpose?
Was it some mystery? I already "asked the administrators", which .... good luck with that one.

December 26, 2015

Home page has a separate depiction of the titled video, "other governments in space"

Why does today's sidebar featuring DU videos portray a still for that featured video with a different picture, which happens to be Bernie Sanders in front of a podium...


When, in fact, there is nothing within the actual video featured on DU upon linking the OP of this video?
here:http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017317458

December 24, 2015

Poll Shows Sanders Would Trounce Trump in General Election

?itok=j-UVE4vo
If the 2016 U.S. presidential election were held today, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) would win by a landslide over GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, according to a new poll released Tuesday by Quinnipiac University.


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/12/23/poll-shows-sanders-would-trounce-trump-general-election
December 19, 2015

Radioactivity in Marcellus Shale Gas Wells report released December 16.

I'm sure this report needs to go to EVERY member of the General Assembly in PA. Tracy Carlucci, who is the Deputy Director, Delaware Riverkeeper Network has passed this report along these awful findings. If you haven't directed the link to your legislator, PLEASE do.

Dangerous radioactive liquids, gases, and solids are entering the environment and potentially contaminating water supplies through practices used in gas well development, storage of produced fluids, and the transport and disposal of drilling wastes. The radioactive materials are then available to be taken in by people and can increase the likelihood of cancers in those exposed.
The critique examines the failings of the TENORM Report that include:
* Inaccurate radon measurements at drilling sites
* Invalid and/or incomplete sampling for radium-226 in rock cuttings
* Invalid and/or incomplete sampling for radium-226 in wastewater
* Invalid methodology for sampling of buried drill cuttings, including closed pits at
individual well sites, sometimes located in the back yards of homes or on active
farmland
* Lack of clarity as to whether the concentrated non-recycled drilling fluids and
sludges were sampled
* No testing of stream water quality, sediments and in-stream habitats
* Lack of planning to sample fluid production pipes, feeder lines, separator and
condensate tanks where radioactive scale can build up over time


More here:
http://www.delawareriverkeeper.org/resources/PressReleases/PR%20DRN%20TENORM%20review%2012.15.15.pdf
December 18, 2015

DNC is accusing Sanders campaign of improper Clinton voter data, but...

DNC: Sanders campaign improperly accessed Clinton voter data

This WaPo story is fishy, if you ask me... Read this and tell me if you don't think something's up. I put NOTHING past the DNC...

Officials with the Democratic National Committee have accused the presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders of improperly accessing confidential voter information gathered by the rival campaign of Hillary Clinton, according to several party officials.

Jeff Weaver, the Vermont senator’s campaign manager, acknowledged that a low-level staffer had viewed the information but blamed a software vendor hired by the DNC for a glitch that allowed access. Weaver said one Sanders staffer was fired over the incident.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-sanders-campaign-improperly-accessed-clinton-voter-data/2015/12/17/a2e2e14e-a522-11e5-b53d-972e2751f433_story.html?wpisrc=al_alert-national
December 15, 2015

This past Saturday's "out in the street" for Bernie commentary...

I've been meeting up with a local Bernie Sanders group and have shared a few experiences here. We've mostly walked and talked among the student population, the lower income black population, and Saturday, we were in Shadyside's higher end shopping district. It was an extremely good time to see and speak to persons who were middle class or higher, young, middle aged, mostly white, I'd say, though I had some good conversations with black couples who didn't know much about Senator Sanders.

One sidewalk cafe moment when asking some diners about Bernie, a woman made a remark in a condescending manner with, "No, thank you... We're capitalists!" I paused and made sure she saw my curious face as I answered back, "That's interesting, because I am, too." I continued talking to the adjoining persons and then said, "It's interesting how many people think that a thriving economy wouldn't be primary to everyone, regardless of income." I'm pretty sure this woman was in disbelief.

What would you have said extemporaneously to a comment like that, I wonder?

December 14, 2015

The Discussionist Discussions...

I'm thinking about this weekend, when I decided to go over to DI (seldom, but I about doubled my post count past the 160 mark, now, so you can see I was trying to have conversation).

Noted: The Jury is more forgiving for snark and assholery

Noted: I can argue with conservatives about things, and then get some good links so that I know way more about case law and the second amendment

Noted: I shall return.... And, I don't think I have to wait for a DU offline situation

Finally, Noted: Lots of big breasted tee shirt ads. As a woman, I think I know who some of those assholes might be.



MMM

December 8, 2015

Tony Norman: Armed and righteous, Liberty University mocks Christ

By Tony Norman / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
link: http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/tony-norman/2015/12/08/Tony-Norman-Armed-and-righteous-School-mocks-Christ/stories/201512080056

Jerry get your gun: The president of Liberty University wants his entire student body to pack heat.


Last Friday, the president of America’s largest Christian university wasn’t tolerating any of that loose talk about turning the other cheek. Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. refused to be that kind of false prophet. After all, this is America.

No, Mr. Falwell would not ask the 110,000 students enrolled at his university (95,000 of them online) to love their enemy the way Jesus did. He would not ask them to “put away” their sword the way Jesus compelled Peter to do on the night he was arrested and dragged before authorities for a show trial and a morning execution.

“It just blows my mind when I see the president of the United States say that the answer to circumstances like [mass shootings] is more gun control,” Mr. Falwell said. “If some of those people in that community center [in San Bernardino] had what I’ve got in my back pocket right now,” Mr. Falwell said with a chuckle, reaching for his back and letting his words trail off into a swirl of applause and cheers. “Is it illegal to pull it out? I don’t know.


Smug little thug, wearing the blood of anybody but Jesus.... I think I know who should have pulled out....
December 7, 2015

George Will can't express himself very well on taxation, it seems...

This morning's Pittsburgh Post Gazette predictably carried Will's Wash-Po column, though, for the life of me, I can't figure out WHY. He's such a bad writer. I've historically stopped mid column, mostly due to the nonsense within each missive, but lately, I've actually tried to understand the logic behind it, or why it couldn't be said with clearer intent. I gave this morning's read the good ole college try again...

So, in this 103rd year of the income tax, it is timely to note that there still is no intellectually sturdy case for progressive taxation.

Arguments for it are invariably arguments for increased equality of social outcomes. Because individuals have different vocational desires and different aptitudes for adding value to the economy, inequality is inevitable. Because individuals have different social sensibilities, opinions will differ about what degrees of inequality are intolerably unlovely (more about this aesthetic metric in a moment). But inequality, even when unlovely to some, is unjust only when it arises from unjust social arrangements. So, the degree to which inequality is morally troubling depends on the degree to which the process that allocates wealth does so according to political influence and rent-seeking rather than merit and self-reliance.


For more of this unreadable intent about progressive taxation...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-nonexistent-case-for-progressive-taxation/2015/12/04/4ef17830-99e6-11e5-8917-653b65c809eb_story.html

If someone is given national exposure to a writing, is it too hard to hard to expect a clear argument? I think he should go back to sports analogies, because the subjects in which he does not excel are not presented clearly either... certainly not progressive taxation, and for that matter, anything political. Reading him is like a getting through a sand and mud in your flip-flops.

Profile Information

Name: WhoisSkinnerMarriedTo
Gender: Do not display
Member since: Tue Dec 14, 2004, 07:30 PM
Number of posts: 20,453

About MrMickeysMom

DU 2 to should be introduced and married to DU 3. They should produce offspring who represent the best of both parents.
Latest Discussions»MrMickeysMom's Journal