Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
friendly_iconoclast
friendly_iconoclast's Journal
friendly_iconoclast's Journal
September 29, 2017
If I'm reading this correctly, the judges just punted to the Supremes.
Washington Post: Appeals court order blocks enforcement of D.C.s strict concealed carry law
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-order-blocks-enforcement-of-dcs-strict-gun-control-law/2017/09/28/04734362-a482-11e7-ade1-76d061d56efa_story.html?utm_term=.d50baff2c763D.C. officials will not be able to enforce the citys strict limits on carrying concealed firearms on the streets of the nations capital under a court order issued Thursday.
The brief statement from a federal appeals court in Washington is the latest setback for the Districts efforts to restrict the carrying of guns in public places to people who demonstrate a good reason to do so.
The Districts top lawyer had asked the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to rehear a challenge to the gun-control law after a panel of three judges ruled against the city in July. But on Thursday, the appeals court declined, without explanation, to revisit the case...
...The order from the D.C. Circuit indicates that none of the courts 10 judges who reviewed the citys petition asked for a vote on the request for rehearing.
The brief statement from a federal appeals court in Washington is the latest setback for the Districts efforts to restrict the carrying of guns in public places to people who demonstrate a good reason to do so.
The Districts top lawyer had asked the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to rehear a challenge to the gun-control law after a panel of three judges ruled against the city in July. But on Thursday, the appeals court declined, without explanation, to revisit the case...
...The order from the D.C. Circuit indicates that none of the courts 10 judges who reviewed the citys petition asked for a vote on the request for rehearing.
If I'm reading this correctly, the judges just punted to the Supremes.
September 22, 2017
CBS: D.C. court rules tracking phones without a warrant is unconstitutional
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-court-rules-warrant-is-required-for-stingray-cell-phone-tracking/Law enforcement use of one tracking tool, the cell-site simulator, to track a suspect's phone without a warrant violates the Constitution, the D.C. Court of Appeals said Thursday in a landmark ruling for privacy and Fourth Amendment rights as they pertain to policing tactics
The ruling could have broad implications for law enforcement's use of cell-site simulators, which local police and federal agencies can use to mimic a cell phone tower to the phone connect to the device instead of its regular network...
...D.C. Metropolitan Police's use of such cell-site simulator technology to nab suspect Prince Jones in 2013 "violated the Fourth Amendment," the court decided against the U.S. government on Thursday.
"We thus conclude that under ordinary circumstances, the use of a cell-site simulator to locate a person through his or her cellphone invades the person's actual, legitimate and reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her location information and is a search," the court ruling said. "The government's argument to the contrary is unpersuasive."
The ruling could have broad implications for law enforcement's use of cell-site simulators, which local police and federal agencies can use to mimic a cell phone tower to the phone connect to the device instead of its regular network...
...D.C. Metropolitan Police's use of such cell-site simulator technology to nab suspect Prince Jones in 2013 "violated the Fourth Amendment," the court decided against the U.S. government on Thursday.
"We thus conclude that under ordinary circumstances, the use of a cell-site simulator to locate a person through his or her cellphone invades the person's actual, legitimate and reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her location information and is a search," the court ruling said. "The government's argument to the contrary is unpersuasive."
September 16, 2017
One officer left standing after indictments of Baltimore Gun Trace Task Force members
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-clewell-gun-task-force-20170905-story.htmlBaltimore Police Det. John Clewell worked nearly two years on the departments gun trace task force an elite unit that raided homes throughout the city searching for firearms in an effort to quell historic rates of violence.
Were the make stuff happen police, Clewell told a Northeast Baltimore couple whose apartment he raided in April 2015, according to his own account of the incident in charging documents.
Now Clewell is the only member of the task force who has not been indicted on federal racketeering charges.
The rest of the unit has been accused of robbing suspects, filing false paperwork and committing overtime fraud. Seven members were indicted by a federal grand jury in March; an eighth was indicted in August.
Were the make stuff happen police, Clewell told a Northeast Baltimore couple whose apartment he raided in April 2015, according to his own account of the incident in charging documents.
Now Clewell is the only member of the task force who has not been indicted on federal racketeering charges.
The rest of the unit has been accused of robbing suspects, filing false paperwork and committing overtime fraud. Seven members were indicted by a federal grand jury in March; an eighth was indicted in August.
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Sep 8, 2006, 12:47 PMNumber of posts: 15,333