Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
SunSeeker
SunSeeker's Journal
SunSeeker's Journal
September 6, 2013
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2013/09/05/assad_s_war_crimes_why_hasn_t_he_been_charged_with_war_crimes_by_the_international.html
Why Hasn’t Assad Been Charged With War Crimes?
Given the allegations currently being leveled at Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, readers might be wondering why Assad and his senior commanders have not been charged with war crimes by the International Criminal Court like leaders such as Libyas Muammar Qaddafi and Sudans Omar al-Bashir. After all, the court was specifically set up to have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern, and last months chemical attacks certainly fit the bill. A number of NGOs and dozens of countries have called for such a prosecution.
Unfortunately, international law is once again protecting Assads violations of international law. Syria is not a state party to the ICC (neither, for what its worth, is the United States) and therefore its prosecutors dont have jurisdiction over crimes committed there. For Assad to be charged by the ICC, he would have to be referred by the U.N. Security Council which, as with an authorization for military intervention, isnt going to happen as long as Russia and China have seats. Marc Lynch discussed a few other possible avenues for Assads prosecution a few weeks ago, but for now, a prosecution seems extremely unlikely, even as the Syrian government commits exactly the sort of crimes the court was set up to deal with.
Unfortunately, international law is once again protecting Assads violations of international law. Syria is not a state party to the ICC (neither, for what its worth, is the United States) and therefore its prosecutors dont have jurisdiction over crimes committed there. For Assad to be charged by the ICC, he would have to be referred by the U.N. Security Council which, as with an authorization for military intervention, isnt going to happen as long as Russia and China have seats. Marc Lynch discussed a few other possible avenues for Assads prosecution a few weeks ago, but for now, a prosecution seems extremely unlikely, even as the Syrian government commits exactly the sort of crimes the court was set up to deal with.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2013/09/05/assad_s_war_crimes_why_hasn_t_he_been_charged_with_war_crimes_by_the_international.html
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHome country: USA
Current location: Southern California
Member since: Sun Mar 20, 2011, 12:05 PM
Number of posts: 51,550