HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Goodheart » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 45 Next »

Goodheart

Profile Information

Member since: Sat Apr 8, 2017, 08:19 PM
Number of posts: 4,388

Journal Archives

So, what are we waiting for?

Why the delay?

Without naming names, it's looking more and more to me that "no man is above the law" is current b.s. Looking more and more to me that "equal justice under the law" is current b.s.

It's a sure thing... if I was found with slam dunk evidence of a crime the authorities-that-be wouldn't wait to charge me pending investigation of even more crimes. I'd be indicted already, and those other investigations would proceed, anyway.

If I was found with slam dunk evidence of a crime those authorities wouldn't wait pending some future political event. I'd be indicted already.

Justice delayed is propagation of unequal justice, period. We are not being justly served.


NBC: Special Master gives trump deadline to back up his allegation that the FBI planted evidence

I can't recall that his legal team ever included such an allegation in their filings.

[link:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/special-master-mar-lago-case-asks-trump-back-allegation-fbi-planted-ev-rcna49023|

Is this New York law still binding? Juries in civil cases don't have to be unanimous

Looks like a 1937 law says only 10 of 12 required for a decision:

[link:https://www.jstor.org/stable/1116795#:~:text=Procedure-Five-sixths%20Jury%20Verdicts-New%20York%20Legislation%20of%201937.-%22Unanimous%20verdicts,civil%20case%3B%20and%20no%20jury%20shall%20be%20dis-|

WTF. DOJ says it's OK with trump-backed candidate as "Special Master"

I guess they're thinking it doesn't much matter at this point?

[link:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/u-s-justice-department-says-it-would-support-trump-backed-candidate-as-special-master/ar-AA11Kuwu?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f4a2f23576f6468b80f53fd3e83a1474|

America's greatest living talent? My vote.

Stevie Wonder.

I'm sitting here listening to "I Never Dreamed You Leave in Summer" and am just marveling at the man's ability to craft melodies.... and that's before even mentioning his astonishing musical skills on the keyboard, harmonica, etc. And that voice!

And I consider his string of Innervision, Fulfillingness' First Finale, and Songs in the Key of Life the most impressive trifecta of consecutive albums ever produced by any musician of any genre, anywhere, and at any time.... and that's not even mentioning Talking Book which preceded those three.



The rarest human diseases.

I really hate that ad. It's revolting. Meant to repulse anybody who looks at it.

How much do I have to pay to get rid of it?


Does it make sense to anybody that trump would call for the special master to have top secret/SCI

security clearance if he's already declassified the materials?

On page 14 of their filing yesterday:

"Movant also agrees that it would be appropriate for the special master to possess a Top Secret/SCI security clearance. "

Is this a case of "oh what a tangled web we weave", or incompetence, or not a contradiction at all?

Does the FBI still have Hunter's laptop? And why?

How is this not an invasion of privacy? Where's the probable cause?

This is a juicy one. trump now officially under investigation as Russian nuke spy

So, I'm wondering how credible is inteldrop.com ?

[link:https://theinteldrop.com/2022/08/12/its-official-trump-under-investigation-as-russian-nuke-spy/|]

We do know that Russian state TV recently said this:

Im very worried for our agent Trump. They found everything at Mar-a-Lago, they got packages of documents. In all seriousness, they say he should be executed as a person that was ready to hand off nuclear secrets to Russia.

[link:https://news.yahoo.com/putin-world-declares-agent-trump-211215321.html?soc_src=strm&soc_trk=tw|]

You know, maybe if Garland had indicted the f*cker on the 10 counts of Mueller obstruction,

as trump SHOULD HAVE BEEN almost immediately upon vacating the presidency, Garland wouldn't have had to deal with obstruction in this documents case. And maybe some national secrets would have been secured? And maybe Jared wouldn't have his $2 billion? And maybe even some lives would have been saved?

Yes, Garland seems to be playing everything correctly in THIS case, but what about those that preceded this one? Can you tell I'm not as delighted with him as some others here seem to be?










Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 45 Next »