Otto Lidenbrock
Otto Lidenbrock's JournalJoe Biden ripping into Ronald Reagan and explaining Republicans don't really care about the deficit
https://twitter.com/JoeTeens/status/1215107579203989505But I keep hearing from Biden detractors online that he is Republican-lite or a Republican from the 1980s
Judge Judy endorses Michael Bloomberg
AOC: "In any other country, Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party, but in America, we are."
The same goes for the party as a whole: Democrats can be too big of a tent.
It is comments like that that kept Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of the Democratic Party from reaching any kind of meaningful détente. I asked her what she thought her role would be as a member of Congress during, for instance, a Joe Biden presidency. Oh God, she said with a groan. In any other country, Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party, but in America, we are.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/aoc-first-year-in-washington.html
It's a bizarre comment given Joe has been a democrat since 1969, was the AOC of his era (elected to the senate at age 30), was ranked a solid liberal by accounts of his senate votes through the years and more importantly in my opinion, in other countries like the UK which has multiple parties having parliamentary seats, it is still between two parties for being the party in government. So for that reason having a big tent is important.
Folks, stop falling for twitter manipulation and clickbait soundbites
When candidates do town halls they are not giving five word answers. That should be pretty damn obvious. Yet this page in the past 24 hours has been full of misrepresentation of two responses Joe Biden gave. One about a republican VP and one about coal miners learning to code.
Here is an example of how Twitter pundits blow up these out of context.
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1211763536218730498
The day after Mr Weigel provides the full answer.
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1212029513166655489
Now you may still disagree with Biden's analysis but it's a much more thorough answer than reported initially where the hot-take that went viral was one line at the start and one line at the end while everything in between got glossed over.
I made the same point regarding Pete Buttigieg's comments about Anthony Kennedy and the Supreme Court in October. A viral tweet that gathered 10000 likes was a total false representation. The viral tweet was a deliberately cut out snippet with the context removed and provided no source so if you were like me who was sceptical you had to find the link yourself and read it in full context for yourself. If you did that, like me, you'd realise that tweet and the outrage it caused was a lie to smear Pete when he was on a surge.
It was a lengthy post but something I saw through then and urge others to do so now.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287323624
I'm an undecided voter because no candidate really strikes me as particularly standing out. They all are flawed in some ways. But as a voter it's my responsibility to learn about them. Watch their speeches myself, hear the interviews myself, read the articles myself. Social media is an open forum for disinformation and now more than ever we as voters should do our own homework rather than get sucked into every tweet we want to be true.
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Jun 20, 2018, 07:20 PMNumber of posts: 581