Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dem4Life1102

Dem4Life1102's Journal
Dem4Life1102's Journal
February 24, 2021

Question about my employer

I work for a very large company and recently, for security purposes, they are requiring all employees to download security software on their personal mobile device to access their company laptops. Only a small number of upper level managers are provided with mobile phones that are paid for by the company.

Question: Is it reasonable or unreasonable for the company to require all employees to download software on devices they don’t pay for in order to do their job? (I’ll also add that the software requires a certain level of hardware and software that may cause some employees to incur an expense to upgrade their device.)

February 21, 2021

"Mark Changed The Rules": How Facebook Went Easy On Alex Jones And Other Right-Wing Figures

“Mark Changed The Rules”: How Facebook Went Easy On Alex Jones And Other Right-Wing Figures

Facebook’s rules to combat misinformation and hate speech are subject to the whims and political considerations of its CEO and his policy team leader.


Ryan Mac
Craig Silverman

In April 2019, Facebook was preparing to ban one of the internet’s most notorious spreaders of misinformation and hate, Infowars founder Alex Jones. Then CEO Mark Zuckerberg personally intervened.

Jones had gained infamy for claiming that the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school massacre was a “giant hoax,” and that the teenage survivors of the 2018 Parkland shooting were “crisis actors.” But Facebook had found that he was also relentlessly spreading hate against various groups, including Muslims and trans people. That behavior qualified him for expulsion from the social network under the company's policies for "dangerous individuals and organizations," which required Facebook to also remove any content that expressed “praise or support” for them.

But Zuckerberg didn’t consider the Infowars founder to be a hate figure, according to a person familiar with the decision, so he overruled his own internal experts and opened a gaping loophole: Facebook would permanently ban Jones and his company — but would not touch posts of praise and support for them from other Facebook users. This meant that Jones’ legions of followers could continue to share his lies across the world’s largest social network.

"Mark personally didn’t like the punishment, so he changed the rules,” a former policy employee told BuzzFeed News, noting that the original rule had already been in use and represented the product of untold hours of work between multiple teams and experts.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/mark-zuckerberg-joel-kaplan-facebook-alex-jones

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Home country: United States
Current location: NYC
Member since: Thu Sep 26, 2019, 09:18 AM
Number of posts: 3,974
Latest Discussions»Dem4Life1102's Journal