Mr.WeRP
Mr.WeRP's JournalOne of the Epstein documents is a victim's statement that when she was 13 and pregnant, Trump raped her
Additionally, Trump was present when her uncle killed the newborn.https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1ptxtjv/trump_raped_13_year_old_and_witnessed_murder_of/
Justice Dept. document: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf
Statement regarding Trump:
me to (redacted) with him and he was present when my uncle murdered
my newborn child and disposed of the body in Lake Michigan.
Russia evacuating its people from Venezuela.
https://www.turkiyetoday.com/world/russia-evacuates-diplomats-families-from-venezuela-as-us-seizes-oil-tankers-3211754?s=2The evacuations, which started Friday and include women and children, come as Russian officials assess the situation in Venezuela in what the intelligence source described as "very grim tones." The withdrawals signal heightened concerns about stability in the South American nation as the Trump administration escalates its four-month pressure campaign against President Nicolas Maduro's government.
Trump is taking us to war with Venezuela.
The DoJ did not properly redact the documents. Hopefully these are fully downloaded.
But it looks like the Government released Epstein files are not properly redacted.
Check out this post on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/50501/s/DHOfbE8nVr
The below excerpt is copied from a redacted portion of this document:
DoJ Link
conduct by paying large sums of money to participant-witnesses, including by paying for their
attorneys fees and case costs in litigation related to this conduct.
204. Epstein also threatened harm to victims and helped release damaging stories
about them to damage their credibility when they tried to go public with their stories of being
trafficked and sexually abused.
205. Epstein also instructed one or more Epstein Enterprise participant-witnesses to
destroy evidence relevant to ongoing court proceedings involving Defendants criminal sex
trafficking and abuse conduct.
The above three sections are completely redacted from this document on the government website. However if you select the redaction region, copy and paste it, you get the entire text for the redacted portion.
I know others have fully downloaded the data so this should be doable on the downloaded content as well.
On edit: you can also search the redacted document and it highlights the redacted regions with the matching text.
Looks like Youtube is blocking MS NOW
https://youtube.com/@msnow?si=vAjkjqstlLbs6TJgThe videos are hidden due to location (US). Looks like Canada and UK are blocked as well. I know you can always go direct to MS NOW but many people use youtube for their main TV Access.
We are in full on dictatorship with no freedom of speech.
I had a vision and I now know how Trump will die
It will be Trump Derangement Syndrome!
Only a narcissistic psychopath as severe as he is would die from the constant stress of vanity.
When It Happens
Lawrence Tribe on how fucked Kegsbreath is...
Department of Defense Law of War Manual, Sec. 18.3.2.1 states the "requirement" to refuse illegal orders.
— Laurence H. Tribe (@tribelaw.bsky.social) 2025-12-01T13:48:59.972Z
Whatâs its key example? Wait for it . . . Itâs "orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."
Whats its key example? Wait for it . . . Its "orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."
BREAKING: Leaked calls prove Russia authored the peace deal
Just Staggering: Trump Aides Leaked Phone Call With Putin Advisor Stuns Punditshttps://www.mediaite.com/politics/just-staggering-trump-aides-leaked-phone-call-with-putin-advisor-stuns-pundits/
The transcript shows Witkoff coaching his Russian counterpart on how to flatter President Donald Trump in order for him to be more amenable to Russias wants in the negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.
The transcript also included Witkoff telling the Russians, I know what its going to take to get a peace deal done: Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere. But Im saying instead of talking like that, lets talk more hopefully because I think were going to get to a deal here. And I think Yuri, the president will give me a lot of space and discretion to get to the deal.
Bloomberg also published an October 29 phone call between Yuri Ushakov, Vladimir Putins most senior foreign-policy adviser, and Kirill Dmitriev, an economic adviser to the Russian president.
During that call, Dmitriev appeared to suggest that the draft of the recent peace plan came from Russia. No, look. I think well just make this paper from our position, and Ill informally pass it along, making it clear that its all informal. And let them do like their own. But, I dont think theyll take exactly our version, but at least itll be as close to it as possible, Dmitriev. The Trump-backed proposal was quickly derided as offering too many concessions to Russia, including by many GOP members of Congress.
The next Democratic POTUS
Better not ignore the past and move forward.
We need justice.
We need to prevent anything like a Trump again. There are far smarter and more evil versions of him quietly watching and waiting from the shadows. We need to send them all a message: that fucking with the Peoples Democracy comes with the ultimate price.
Otherwise we are doomed to more greater suffering. No Garlands. We need prosecutorial bull dogs. Follow the law, but dont give into the bullshit platitudes that allowed Trumps second Presidency.
We also need to send a message to MAGA. Education matters. Individual freedoms matter. Make it impossible to discriminate. Pardon all illegal immigrants with no violent criminal records and give them immediate citizenship. Reaffirm this countrys status as a melting pot nation of immigrants.
And finally, but most importantly, make the rich pay while taking away their power. Codify the reversal of Citizens United and tax the ever loving fuck out of the 1%.
We may get only one more chance to do this, and thats only if we continue to resist with tenacity.
Breaking: Putin authored Trump's Ukraine "deal"
https://newrepublic.com/post/203517/trump-ukraine-peace-deal-russian-languageTrumps Ukraine Peace Deal Appears to Be Translated From Russian
Certain phrases in Trumps proposed deal seem to be using Russian language.
The syntax of certain phrases are more common in the Russian language, such as the third point of the 28-point plan: It is expected that Russia will not invade neighbouring countries and Nato will not expand further.
It is expected is not commonly used in English, but it is common in Russian and appears to come from the phrase ожидается or ozhidayetsya, according to The Guardians Luke Harding. Other words that appear to be translated from Russian include ambiguities (неоднозначности
Holy Shit! Halligan spliced transcripts to court claiming Grand Jury did see both indictments!
This judge is about to go nuclear when they read this response:
Reddit Law Subreddit discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/CofesKS6XW
Response filed by Halligan: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136.206.0.pdf
Link to explanation: https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/YJpoEvNNoV
"Il. The Court Acknowledged the Clerical Discrepancy and Directed That the Two-Count True Bill Be Docketed"
Below it, sentence fragment --> transcript image --> paragraph --> image.
The first transcript image shows that the magistrate identifies the two conflicting documents, "I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent." (Magistrate's quote)
Discrepancy -- check; court confirmed.
Now, let's go back to the Sect. Il title: "Direct That the Two-Count True Bill Be Docketed"
That's not exactly what happened though...
"I assume you intended to make it public, so these both will go on the docket in -272 now that it's been presented in open court. I just want to make sure that you understand that and that was your intention."
That, on one hand, is a magistrate judge obviously declaring what will or won't be on the record, but the key point (for me -- I'm sure someone else will vociferously disagree) is that when the judge is clarifying or trying to elucidate intent, they're not actually in direction or control of the substantive matter, rather they're procedurally ensuring that the jury's will be enacted.
The jury, it seems, never actually saw the indictment that Halligan was pushing forth, because only the foreperson and juror (from the reporting elsewhere) signed it, not all 12.
That's just example, but when you piece it together with, "any assertion that the grand jury
"never voted on the two-count indictment" is contradicted by the official transcriptLI" it doesn't pass the smell test on whiff.
Even their conclusion doesn't hit the real problem: the federal grand jury NEVER SAW THE INDICTMENT THAT THE FEDERAL PROSECUTOR PURSUED.
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Feb 29, 2024, 12:20 AMNumber of posts: 1,098