Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A tweet worth reading on the NFL player protest. [View all]applegrove
(118,617 posts)8. And defence department paying for the anthem does not make it a public event?
Right. You are just paid to protect the biggest wedge issue the GOP cultivates: racism.
Cannot have the GOP base connecting with their favourite players on a viceral human level about injustice. Where would the tax cuts for very rich people be then?.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But, the other examples you cited did not protest in the capacity of an employee.
Trust Buster
May 2018
#1
Free speech gives the rich the right to endlessly fund campaigns under citizens united.
applegrove
May 2018
#2
Not to mention that there is no question that they acquiesced to repeated demands by the president
EffieBlack
May 2018
#47
Why do you imagine being an employee in a US-taxpayer-funded stadium should make a difference? n/t
Judi Lynn
May 2018
#4
Because, the players are contracted employees of a business. Any business needs to attract the
Trust Buster
May 2018
#6
The NFL tossed the right to that argument when they cut a deal with the military
Takket
May 2018
#34
That is why allowing the option of staying in the locker room is a reasonable solution. Thanks.
Trust Buster
May 2018
#7
And defence department paying for the anthem does not make it a public event?
applegrove
May 2018
#8
In the end you are correct they are the employer and they can set the rules. nt
Kirk Lover
May 2018
#13
The NFL CLAIMS it is separate competing teams. If so they are colluding now.
sharedvalues
May 2018
#19
It is in a symbiotic relationship with the government and, thus, this decision constitutes state
EffieBlack
May 2018
#49
They are employees. That is a fact. You just can't declare whatever is uncomfortable to you
Trust Buster
May 2018
#25
No employer of any era would want his business co-opted by employees to be used as a
Trust Buster
May 2018
#33
They are alienating a significant portion of their employers customer base.
Trust Buster
May 2018
#26
No it isn't. Many customers are opposed to this. That is a well reported fact.
Trust Buster
May 2018
#28
Enough customers to concern these business owners. Many moderates included.
Trust Buster
May 2018
#30
And many customers are alienated by the owners decision to shut the players down
EffieBlack
May 2018
#50