General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump, caps lock: "AFTER TWO YEARS AND MILLIONS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS, NO COLLUSION!" [View all]Denzil_DC
(7,232 posts)People who fill threads on an OP about a tweet with endless complaints about the fact the OP has a tweet in it.
It's not as if the OP's content could have come as much of a surprise, given the title.
If your secondary gripe is that there's no commentary on the tweet, then that undercuts your dismissal of Twitter as a concept: "The food was terrible - and such small helpings!"
What a waste of everybody's time and energy.
If you're not interested or don't like it, why not do what any number of us do on any number of OPs we end up not being interested in and don't click on them if it's evident they're Twitter-based in the first place, or if you've clicked in and been disappointed, just click out and get on with your day and leave others who just might be interested in having a discussion about the content of the OP get on with theirs?