Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)

1. K&R, Barr or Mueller mentioned "Russian government" also knowing damn well Putin would

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Wed Apr 17, 2019, 09:00 PM

Apr 2019

... always have plausible deniability.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NO WONDER no charges filed for conspiracy... or collusion, whatever they call it. [View all] Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 OP

K&R, Barr or Mueller mentioned "Russian government" also knowing damn well Putin would uponit7771 Apr 2019 #1

And it has to be between them and GOVT OFFICIALS, another BULLSHIT Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #3

+1 uponit7771 Apr 2019 #4

What it means is that there was collusion. The report will be damning. nt UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #2

No, it means unless it is in writing or on tape that they made an agreement to collude, there wont Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #5

I'm not surprised at this...I was expecting it now that I know what the legal requirements are to UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #9

but those ARE NOT THE LEGAL requirements, that is the WHOLE POINT of the article Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #10

We still need to see the full report - no redactions FakeNoose Apr 2019 #6

not a lawyer, but the sense I get is that yeah, they're saying this specific crime can't be proved anarch Apr 2019 #7

They are using the WRONG definition of what you have to have to prove it Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #8

yeah...weasel words and more obfuscation anarch Apr 2019 #11

What the hell is "If it is what you say it is, I love it" if not a tacit agreement??? RockRaven Apr 2019 #12

Yes but EVEN That is NOT the legal requirement. I think most are missing the point of this article Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #13

OP, read up on difference between "collusion" (not a legal term) and "criminal conspiracy" which yes Kashkakat v.2.0 Apr 2019 #14

NO the point is they are using the WRONG definition, so YES there IS Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #15

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NO WONDER no charges file...»Reply #1