Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)

5. No, it means unless it is in writing or on tape that they made an agreement to collude, there wont

Reply to UniteFightBack (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 17, 2019, 09:01 PM

Apr 2019

be and OF COURSE that wont exist.

They colluded their fucking BRAINS out but at no time will there be a contract to this point or rump himself on tape agreeing to collude.

We are being FUCKED

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NO WONDER no charges filed for conspiracy... or collusion, whatever they call it. [View all] Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 OP

K&R, Barr or Mueller mentioned "Russian government" also knowing damn well Putin would uponit7771 Apr 2019 #1

And it has to be between them and GOVT OFFICIALS, another BULLSHIT Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #3

+1 uponit7771 Apr 2019 #4

What it means is that there was collusion. The report will be damning. nt UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #2

No, it means unless it is in writing or on tape that they made an agreement to collude, there wont Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #5

I'm not surprised at this...I was expecting it now that I know what the legal requirements are to UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #9

but those ARE NOT THE LEGAL requirements, that is the WHOLE POINT of the article Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #10

We still need to see the full report - no redactions FakeNoose Apr 2019 #6

not a lawyer, but the sense I get is that yeah, they're saying this specific crime can't be proved anarch Apr 2019 #7

They are using the WRONG definition of what you have to have to prove it Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #8

yeah...weasel words and more obfuscation anarch Apr 2019 #11

What the hell is "If it is what you say it is, I love it" if not a tacit agreement??? RockRaven Apr 2019 #12

Yes but EVEN That is NOT the legal requirement. I think most are missing the point of this article Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #13

OP, read up on difference between "collusion" (not a legal term) and "criminal conspiracy" which yes Kashkakat v.2.0 Apr 2019 #14

NO the point is they are using the WRONG definition, so YES there IS Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #15