Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(32,017 posts)

5. If we eliminated it, would they later restore it?

Fri Mar 6, 2020, 12:42 PM

Mar 2020

If not, doesn’t that prove that it has outlived its usefulness, for better or for worse?

-Laelth

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Eliminating the Filibuster. [View all] Laelth Mar 2020 OP

Elections have consequences vlyons Mar 2020 #1

If we eliminated it, would they later restore it? Laelth Mar 2020 #5

We did that with judges and we'll pay for it for 40 years. jimfields33 Mar 2020 #3

I don't see how we can get anything done if we don't. Laelth Mar 2020 #4

The republicans can sue to stop every bill we put up jimfields33 Mar 2020 #6

And vice versa. marble falls Mar 2020 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author jimfields33 Mar 2020 #10

Senator Reid pushed that through during POTUS Obama. AncientGeezer Mar 2020 #14

exactly, it is a short sighted idiotic idea Amishman Mar 2020 #13

Getting rid of the filibuster is a bad idea ... marble falls Mar 2020 #7