Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Turin_C3PO

(13,941 posts)
21. I said I'm for
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 12:45 PM
Nov 2020

election security. But until there’s evidence that vote switching has occurred, I’m not going to lose sleep over a theoretical situation.

Banning those machines needs to be a very high priority. lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #1
We need a massive update/rewrite of Voting law, including that... Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #4
+1 So much ratfuckery at every level needs to be stopped. lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #12
While I understand your point, I am against releasing vote machine coding to the public. Claustrum Nov 2020 #2
Valid point, but it needs oversight by gov't engineers... Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #3
I would have believe government engineers before Trump era. Claustrum Nov 2020 #8
I believe that voting machine software in Australia is publicly inspectable. Goodheart Nov 2020 #6
I am not just worrying about changing actual votes. Claustrum Nov 2020 #16
No need. Just ban the damned things. They were created for only one purpose. To steal elections. lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #13
Get rid of the electronic machines! PJMcK Nov 2020 #27
There is no need for electronic voting machines... hunter Nov 2020 #29
Jon Bel Edwards (D) was elected Governor on the same voting machines... brooklynite Nov 2020 #5
Until now, you mean. Goodheart Nov 2020 #7
And, by the way, if the machine code, itself, is programmed to switch every 10th vote from Goodheart Nov 2020 #9
The whole nation needs voter-verified paper ballots duhneece Nov 2020 #10
Oh for God's sake greenjar_01 Nov 2020 #11
What's your problem? Goodheart Nov 2020 #14
? You are opposed to election security? lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #15
There's been no proof Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #17
Your post is a classic non sequitur. Goodheart Nov 2020 #18
"I" Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #19
You have no way of knowing whether it's happened or not. Goodheart Nov 2020 #20
I said I'm for Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #21
It's not accurate to describe vote switching as "theoretically possible". Goodheart Nov 2020 #22
I think Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #24
I certainly agree with that. But if somebody's devious enough to suppress votes Goodheart Nov 2020 #26
That Is Awfully Cute, Sir The Magistrate Nov 2020 #28
It's "non sequitur", and, yes, he/she committed one. Goodheart Nov 2020 #30
Oooh --- 'fallacious' The Magistrate Nov 2020 #31
I was pleased on my return to Texas carpetbagger Nov 2020 #23
That should be the practice EVERYWHERE. Goodheart Nov 2020 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We seem to have forgotten...»Reply #21