Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnDoutside

(20,522 posts)
28. That's terrible, but I got the understanding that these therapeutics will be for those who will be
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 08:46 AM
Feb 2021

recovering from the ravages of the illness in the months to come. At the moment, there isn't much can be done when he is at this stage.

Dr Vin Gupta has spoken about giving people (already medically challenged) therapeutics as soon as they test positive, which is what Trump got, but other than that it is like Russian Roulette to see who dies and who survives.

'Help lessen the load'

A common approach to treating viruses is to give treatments as early as possible, when there's a lesser amount of virus in the body, making it easier for drugs to vanquish it. It's why, for example, the antiviral drug Tamiflu is meant to be given within 48 hours of a person's coming down with the flu.

But drugs like this — which could prevent people from being hospitalized in the first place — are in very limited supply for Covid-19.

Although progress has been made on therapeutics — with one authorized drug, the steroid dexamethasone, shown to help severely ill hospitalized patients, and another, Gilead's remdesivir, which has been approved by the FDA, which may shorten hospital stay — the FDA has authorized just two therapies designed to keep Covid-19 patients out of the hospital.

The treatments — monoclonal antibodies from drugmakers Regeneron and Eli Lilly — are meant to mimic the body's immune response to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, and are authorized for patients at high risk of getting much worse and needing hospitalization.

Regeneron executives have said the company has 80,000 doses ready now to distribute and will ramp up to 300,000 doses in January. Eli Lilly expects that it will supply the U.S. with 350,000 doses of its monoclonal antibody treatment by the end of the month.

But the supply of either treatment so far is not enough to meet demand.Over the past week, the average number of daily cases has surpassed 200,000. And the treatments must be given early, before a patient is sick enough to require hospitalization. That means testing must be readily available, with results delivered quickly.



https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/help-way-how-u-s-will-turn-tide-pandemic-2021-n1250353
This concerns me Dorian Gray Feb 2021 #1
I bet the ones who conceived of spreading the anti vax meme to include MAGAs and Covid applegrove Feb 2021 #11
Active Military refusing should be investigated MyMission Feb 2021 #23
they get anthrax vaccines why the F do they get to refuse this? demtenjeep Feb 2021 #2
Because they are still classified as experimental Drahthaardogs Feb 2021 #18
It shouldn't be up to them. Reader Rabbit Feb 2021 #3
I never knew they had a choice. kskiska Feb 2021 #4
It's because of the Emergency Use Authorization. NutmegYankee Feb 2021 #21
E.D. Claire Oh Nette Feb 2021 #5
I thought when you're in the Army you had to do what they tell you. I don't patricia92243 Feb 2021 #6
It's simple: "no vaccine, you're out" RainCaster Feb 2021 #7
I don't recall being asked... albacore Feb 2021 #8
I don't either! Skittles Feb 2021 #19
I wasn't asked, and we were in a line just like that one. cwydro Feb 2021 #35
My grandson's best friend is in the Navy. tavernier Feb 2021 #9
Apparently they are working hard on therapeutics for people in that OnDoutside Feb 2021 #24
I don't know if he will receive any type of therapeutics. tavernier Feb 2021 #26
That's terrible, but I got the understanding that these therapeutics will be for those who will be OnDoutside Feb 2021 #28
Because it's an emergency use authorization, not a regular approval, they have a choice Ex Lurker Feb 2021 #10
Well, I'm a retired military spouse waiting for the military treatment facility to have helpisontheway Feb 2021 #12
"Refusing" shots was not an option when I was in. cwydro Feb 2021 #13
Same here. Elwood P Dowd Feb 2021 #14
Nothing has changed. former9thward Feb 2021 #16
I doubt we'd have even had the knowledge of any such thing. cwydro Feb 2021 #30
So all an enemy of the US has to do is release a virus knowing soldiers are refusing vaccinations? liberalmuse Feb 2021 #15
when do they have a choice? Demonaut Feb 2021 #17
When I was in the military we had to take vaccines, no and's, or if's, about it. demosincebirth Feb 2021 #20
We need to consider denying health care coverage to anyone for COVID who refuses the vaccine. roamer65 Feb 2021 #22
a long time ago gladium et scutum Feb 2021 #25
Hard to think the military age group is qualified for a vaccine yet? pwb Feb 2021 #27
I think the reason they can refuse Turin_C3PO Feb 2021 #29
When I was in the Army HAB911 Feb 2021 #31
Same thing in the Marines. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2021 #32
still have my little yellow vacs book! HAB911 Feb 2021 #33
Make it mandatory and then discharge those who refuse ("other than honorable" conditions). NurseJackie Feb 2021 #34
Why do they even have a choice? Victor_c3 Feb 2021 #36
Hmmm....I don't remember ever having an opportunity to refuse a vaccine. MineralMan Feb 2021 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Many Service Members Refu...»Reply #28