Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(18,486 posts)

15. They're not

Tue Jun 8, 2021, 11:51 AM

Jun 2021

They would not be his personal lawyer. They would be substituted as the defendant.

I don't think that's going to happen, however.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Joyce Vance on Carroll lawsuit [View all] cilla4progress Jun 2021 OP

The decision is a Sur Zobra Jun 2021 #1

Are Trump appointees holding people hostages in the DOJ building? dalton99a Jun 2021 #2

DOJ's argument really isn't about Trump StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #3

And it's a defense of his words while in office... zaj Jun 2021 #4

A judge will decide. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #9

So we are more concerned about frivolous law suits gab13by13 Jun 2021 #7

No. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #10

Didn't a federal judge already determine gab13by13 Jun 2021 #8

It was a trial court judge but the case in now on appeal. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #12

Yes StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #11

DOJ should not be acting as Trump's personal lawyer. lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #14

They're not StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #15

Even worse! lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #16