General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In the face of clear evidence of a coup, why in the world are we not indicting 45 and accomplices? [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But we have no way of knowing the degree of urgency within DOJ.
We don't know how many U.S. Attorneys, assistant USAs and career attorneys are working on this or how much of their time is being devoted to it or what they're saying and presenting to the grand jury. We don't know how many investigators have been assigned to this case, what they are doing, to whom they're talking, or what they're uncovering. We don't know how many meetings are being held every day about this. We don't know how often the AG is briefed on the progress of the investigation and who is briefing him or how much of his time he's spending on this matter.
We just don't know. For some reason, certain people here deeply resent being told they don't know something, as if it's an insult rather than just a fact. But we. don't. know. So to draw negative assumptions about the tenacity and commitment and courage of the Attorney General and his team, all of whom were appointed by the Democratic president based on what we don't know is illogical and, in my view, inappropriate on a Democratic board.
And, no, in case anyone tries to throw the "stop trying to stifle free speech" complaint that always follows when someone criticizes their point of view, everyone has a right to their opinion and everyone else has a right to say that that opinion is better left unexpressed in certain venues.