Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
52. No.
Sun Dec 26, 2021, 11:36 PM
Dec 2021

Removing a fetus is not “murder” or “infanticide”.

The right wing uses the term infanticide maliciously in their propaganda war.

Abortion is simply last resort birth control.

only restriction allowed Jerry2144 Dec 2021 #1
None. Zip. Zilch. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2021 #2
In simple terms: it's complicated. mwooldri Dec 2021 #3
The main restriction I favor MurrayDelph Dec 2021 #4
My best hope for this Supreme Court is... HariSeldon Dec 2021 #5
That's a private medical decision between a patient and her doctor Arazi Dec 2021 #6
I don't agree that there should be no restrictions iemanja Dec 2021 #7
Only 2% of all abortions in the US are performed after 20 weeks TexasBushwhacker Dec 2021 #16
Roe accommodates that iemanja Dec 2021 #27
The trimester system of Roe was basically abandoned after TexasBushwhacker Dec 2021 #29
Yes, I'm aware of that iemanja Dec 2021 #40
My body, my choice susanr516 Dec 2021 #8
Post removed Post removed Dec 2021 #9
At 38 weeks, it's induced labor, not an abortion. meadowlander Dec 2021 #10
You're right. Thanks for your insight. Beakybird Dec 2021 #12
I definitely don't think that I should have been able to abort my twins Crunchy Frog Dec 2021 #13
This is exactly correct. PTWB Dec 2021 #31
That's true of some pro-choice posters on DU as well, unfortunately. Crunchy Frog Dec 2021 #34
May I ask a question? It's a personal one, and slap me/don't answer if you don't want. moriah Dec 2021 #39
It wasn't formally diagnosed until after I was in labor, Crunchy Frog Dec 2021 #43
First, thank you for so deeply personal of a share. moriah Dec 2021 #48
I don't really see it getting to the point Crunchy Frog Dec 2021 #64
I totally agree with your last paragraph. moriah Dec 2021 #65
I don't care if the mother's life is in danger or not, she can induce at 38 weeks.... moriah Dec 2021 #14
Thank you TexasBushwhacker Dec 2021 #32
No Government Entity Texasgal Dec 2021 #11
The original Roe v Wade already HAS restrictions, based on the social & medical consensus then... Hekate Dec 2021 #15
No ibegurpard Dec 2021 #17
I agree MustLoveBeagles Dec 2021 #90
NO! eShirl Dec 2021 #18
i don't think requiring licensed professional and sanitary facility are too much to ask rampartc Dec 2021 #19
Agreed. lastlib Dec 2021 #28
Before viability. Though the viability window keeps getting pushed Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #20
It's currently considered to be 24 weeks, but a few babies have been saved Crunchy Frog Dec 2021 #35
I was a preemie... electric_blue68 Dec 2021 #67
Wow. That is miraculous for 1953. The little guy I knew was born after 2010. He was in Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #72
Glad things worked out for him! ... electric_blue68 Dec 2021 #86
I guess the status quo (states can ban it after 24-26 weeks) Polybius Dec 2021 #21
Her body, her decision. nt DLevine Dec 2021 #22
No. On demand, without apology, at any time. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #23
So at 36 weeks "Ya know what, I changed my mind" is fine? Polybius Dec 2021 #55
No one advocates for that except politicians who want to ban ALL abortions from conception onward Hekate Dec 2021 #61
Yes, because it's such a rare hypothetical, it's absurd. It just does not happen without a really, WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #71
I passed. The only law that should exist is that the procedure is performed by a Vinca Dec 2021 #24
Morning-after pills are OTC. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #25
How did I miss that? Good to know. Don't tell Texas Republicans. Vinca Dec 2021 #30
They know, and they're working on it... Wounded Bear Dec 2021 #33
They can't do anything until 2023 LeftInTX Dec 2021 #37
You're probably looking at Plan C, not Plan B LeftInTX Dec 2021 #36
That must be it. The one I saw was about $50. Vinca Dec 2021 #41
Plan-C also requires a consultation, even if ordering them from overseas. LeftInTX Dec 2021 #46
I added an Other option MustLoveBeagles Dec 2021 #26
The majority of people in this poll think that abortion should be legal up to the moment of birth? WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #38
And that's why these kinds of polls are nothing but bait. Iggo Dec 2021 #42
I mean...I voted for no restrictions. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #44
Reluctantly, "other". Basically no restrictions - it is up to a woman and her doctor - RandomNumbers Dec 2021 #45
So are you ok with a 25 year old woman simply changing her mind at 36 weeks? Polybius Dec 2021 #57
Stop that. It is a tried and true anti-choice argument. Roe v Wade HAS RESTRICTIONS already... Hekate Dec 2021 #59
Yes, but the Roe restrictions are no longer in place iemanja Dec 2021 #60
Which is why those of us who are pro-choice need to be really clear about RW goals... Hekate Dec 2021 #62
It's what the poll says Polybius Dec 2021 #75
I think it should be stated that no one wants to have an abortion. Xolodno Dec 2021 #47
People do want abortions; that's why they get them. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #50
The only restriction should be that xmas74 Dec 2021 #49
THAT should be decided between a woman and her doctor Skittles Dec 2021 #51
No. roamer65 Dec 2021 #52
I'm okay with limited restrictions in the third trimester Silent3 Dec 2021 #53
As others have pointed out, virtually no doctors will perform an abortion at "any time" NickB79 Dec 2021 #54
I think that a lot of people who voted for "No restrictions at all..." don't understand the poll Polybius Dec 2021 #56
+1 Celerity Dec 2021 #58
That's because no woman actually ever does that, and the way you keep repeating that mantra... Hekate Dec 2021 #63
So you don't understand the poll Polybius Dec 2021 #76
I do not engage in push-polls, and that is what you have constructed. nt Hekate Dec 2021 #79
It wasn't my poll Polybius Dec 2021 #80
You are arguing the case: it might as well be yours Hekate Dec 2021 #82
Re-read the OP Polybius Dec 2021 #83
You and I crossed posts: I edited mine to reflect that while you were responding Hekate Dec 2021 #84
It's all good Polybius Dec 2021 #85
I did the poll MustLoveBeagles Dec 2021 #91
No... I understood it... Ohio Joe Dec 2021 #66
You understood it Polybius Dec 2021 #77
Because abortion decisions are flippant and casual like that? eShirl Dec 2021 #69
Just check out the replies above Polybius Dec 2021 #78
I think virtually all of them believe it's a private medical decision Arazi Dec 2021 #87
I voted no restrictions and I understood the implication. SYFROYH Dec 2021 #93
One restriction: men pay for All abortions period ! RANDYWILDMAN Dec 2021 #68
No restrictions Meowmee Dec 2021 #70
Reproduction creates TWO PEOPLE. Hortensis Dec 2021 #73
. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #74
That's a pretty shocking post, isn't it? nt Hekate Dec 2021 #81
I'm struggling to understand it MustLoveBeagles Dec 2021 #89
Of course not ismnotwasm Dec 2021 #88
Other than ensuring a safe and sanitary facility Mad_Machine76 Dec 2021 #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should there be any restr...»Reply #52