Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

enneacanthus

(51 posts)
4. I'm with you Mr. ER.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 01:17 PM
Mar 2022

Just sent messages to my senators (worthless) and all other Senators on the other aisle that might have a sense of law and justice. I'm waiting on TFG to be indicted too. In the interim...

The message was about Ginni's e-mails and Justice Thomas's conflict of interest. I post below please use as you see fit:

Can Supreme Court Justice Thomas credibly carry on in office when it is revealed that his spouse was involved in a coup to overthrow the government?

Overthrow a duly elected President based on conspiracy theories promoted by the spouse and former law clerks of Justice Thomas?

Without his position on the Court the spouse would have had no special access to the White House via Meadows et al.

My answer as a voting tax paying citizen of the United States is NO; he can never be a credible Justice. Recusals won’t cut it.

This issue needs to be taken up by the Senate immediately. I think the possibility of impeachment is looming. The Court’s credibility has suffered but this may be a deciding blow.

I feel your pain!!! Wuddles440 Mar 2022 #1
Wow, how long did it take to really "lay it between the lines" a hair-width away from Backseat Driver Mar 2022 #2
+1000 smirkymonkey Mar 2022 #3
I'm with you Mr. ER. enneacanthus Mar 2022 #4
They will say Garland is not letting the cat out of the bag yet BlueJac Mar 2022 #5
I'll be happy to admit I was wrong- how about yourself? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #6
+1. but actually .. stopdiggin Mar 2022 #15
Michael Cohen went to jail for paying off Stormy, DOJ let Trump off Scott free. dem4decades Mar 2022 #7
it's time for NBC reporters to go back to Biden for clarification on his philosophy. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #8
I totally missed that story & it's damned depressing. CrispyQ Mar 2022 #10
I found it shocking, too. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #11
Garland is not required to 'adopt' anyone's philosophy stopdiggin Mar 2022 #12
I'll admit I was wrong. I question it everyday. Moreover, I don't attack anyone Gaugamela Mar 2022 #9
I wouldn't hold your breath. BlackSkimmer Mar 2022 #13
How encompassing is your definition of "certain folks"? Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #14
I dont belong in that category, I have been talking about trump and trump alone for years. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #22
If you have so far been talking about Trump alone, you are not anymore. Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #29
Me waiting for the DOJ to indict trump SoonerPride Mar 2022 #16
My guess is that Manhattan DA doesn't want to prosecute a case they aren't 100% certain they'll win Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2022 #17
100% in that case we dont need a justice system... Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #20
I can just see the defense insisting Tree Lady Mar 2022 #30
You and I disagree...knowing someone is guilty and proving it are two different things. Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #18
Those assistant DA's didnt quit in Manhattan for no reason...they must have believed Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #19
That is New York politics and has nothing to do with the feds...but even so, the DA didn't Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #28
Saying "be patient" is an "attack"? brooklynite Mar 2022 #21
Let's fast forward: newdayneeded Mar 2022 #23
I keep hearing all day everyday "He wont even run again" Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #24
And for FUCK SAKE someone who is high up in the D party PLEASE reassure me that Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #25
well not me; I've said from the start that nothing is going to happen to him anarch Mar 2022 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Garland doesn't indict...»Reply #4