Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brush

(53,764 posts)
1. Good stuff. This clause from your post is a good argument against...
Sat May 28, 2022, 05:07 PM
May 2022

the strict constructionists who believe the Constitution should be interpreted as written.

"** There is no individual right to keep and bear arms in the Constitution? That is simply because the founders couldn't imagine a population without guns as in the 18th Century was a necessary and vital tool in each and every house."


Even the second sentence works against their stance that the Constitution has to be taken at its word as written.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The reality of the 2A, "w...»Reply #1