Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pointing out abortions is NOT slut shaming [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)32. Hmm, I'm thinking say "birth forcer"
A woman prevented by force of law from an abortion is a birther (mother) who was forced: a "forced birther".
Boebert wants to prevent abortions by law (not by social engineering because that would mean actually helping people).
Boebert wants to force births, in other people (the hypocrite). She wants to be a forcer (creating the force by voting legislation) and leave the enforcement up to law enforcement officers. She is a "birth forcer" and a "birth enforcer", the latter via proxies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Forcing a human to give birth is literal slavery, it's the best term I can think of. nt
sir pball
Jun 2022
#82
Women forced to give birth are either slaves or cattle, but "birth herder" doesn't have same ring.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2022
#83
It's not as though one of life's mysteries has been revealed by confirming Republicans are hypocrite
gldstwmn
Jun 2022
#13
Did those women try to prevent others from getting the same? If so, then yes. nt
Baltimike
Jun 2022
#16
That doesn't even make any sense. Boebert is a "law maker" and a raging fucking hypocrite.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jun 2022
#81
No different than calling out an anti vaxer who gets a vaccine or one that dies from Covid.
mobeau69
Jun 2022
#8
This is a private decision and deserves to remain private. Isn't there any respect for the privacy
SWBTATTReg
Jun 2022
#11
Yes and thank you. The Republicans have declared open season on women and outing any woman who
gldstwmn
Jun 2022
#12
It is exactly the same as outing anti-vax loudmouths who secretly get vaccinated.
pnwmom
Jun 2022
#55
See Larry Craig, a homophobic GOP Congressman who was arrested for soliciting oral sex in an
emulatorloo
Jun 2022
#30
I have no idea what Lindsay Graham's sexual preference is and I don't like homophobic slurs against
emulatorloo
Jun 2022
#53
Anti-vax men have been outed for being vaccinated. That's a comparable situation.
pnwmom
Jun 2022
#56
Isn't this comparable to Cawthorne's sexual activities outing by the same Muckraker group? n/t
pnwmom
Jun 2022
#70
What I read is that this was not from medical records, so HIPAA wasn't involved.
pnwmom
Jun 2022
#78
+100. This wilful unilateral disarmament under some contrived doctrine of no criticism ever for some
Celerity
Jun 2022
#52
Weaponizing things like this is a shit move. And weaponizing things like abortion and sex work is a
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2022
#27
Lol that I'm playing nice. She's a fucking fascist, but apparently that's not enough.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2022
#33
I understand you are a self-styled iconoclast, but you're essentially protecting these egregious
emulatorloo
Jun 2022
#41
By not calling out hypocrisy you are endorsing it. It's really that simple. nt
Quixote1818
Jun 2022
#43
Yes sounds like it may be baseless. But I still think it is a useful discussion as to whether DU
emulatorloo
Jun 2022
#47
Nope, it's pointed out in the case of Republicans because they want to BAN Abortion rights for
JI7
Jun 2022
#87
Completely agree! And why are some people deadset on vilifying those who call out hypocrites?
AntiFascist
Jun 2022
#80