Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JimPJ

(1 post)

10. Nah

Reply to Smackdown2019 (Original post)

Wed Jul 6, 2022, 09:10 PM

Jul 2022

"to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State"

IOW if Tex goes to NY with his six shooter he can't strap it on and walk around the apple, if Donna from CO goes to TX she can't expect to smoke bowls in public without getting arrested.
OTOH Donna might be able to strap on a gun and Tex can get an abortion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ThePrivileges and Immunities Clause(U.S. Constitution,Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, [View all] Smackdown2019 Jul 2022 OP

Very interesting argument. CanonRay Jul 2022 #1

However, current SCOTUS just ignores... dchill Jul 2022 #2

I think it says the opposite. docgee Jul 2022 #3

Same here. Raven123 Jul 2022 #4

Sorta. TomSlick Jul 2022 #5

What about jurisdiction? docgee Jul 2022 #7

A really difficult question. TomSlick Jul 2022 #8

Works both ways Smackdown2019 Jul 2022 #6

The problem is that by the time a case got anywhere in the courts, it would be too late. TomSlick Jul 2022 #9

Nah JimPJ Jul 2022 #10