General Discussion

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)

52. Well, then you go argue with the DoJ

Mon Oct 3, 2022, 12:46 PM

Oct 2022

Because the DoJ has argued against the court allowing that argument by the defense.

You can believe what you want, but it helps to actually read the documents filed in the case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Today is a big day in Garlands J6 investigation. [View all] fightforfreedom Oct 2022 OP

I hope to all Heaven that you're right. calimary Oct 2022 #1

I hope this gets them (oath keepers) to roll on this pompous asshole too. Botany Oct 2022 #2

I hope they nail Stone too, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #4

There are some oath keepers who will testify as part of their plea deals. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #6

You spelled "Oaf" wrong in Oaf Keeper. 3Hotdogs Oct 2022 #18

:). yikes who gets named Elmer anymore? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #21

hahaha mountain grammy Oct 2022 #26

When I lived in Birmingham I made the mistake of laughing at a name Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #46

haha again.. mountain grammy Oct 2022 #73

Does anyone sniff glue anymore? Remember as a kid Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #81

Kind of explains everything about him, doesn't it? ChazInAz Oct 2022 #27

Yes :). Actually my first thought was glue sniffer Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #47

Be vewey quiet! rambler_american Oct 2022 #82

Somehow it seems ol' Rog has been rolled on already... rubbersole Oct 2022 #8

Kick for all to see...no text Stuart G Oct 2022 #71

The pyramid strategy has been a failure. gab13by13 Oct 2022 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Oct 2022 #10

No, it has not been a failure. That's how criminal investigations are done, from the bottom up. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #12

+1 ancianita Oct 2022 #19

You and OP have really made me think! The whole subject of top down versus bottom up Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #20

J6 committee faces MUCH LOWER standard. Doesn't have to try cases in front of judge and jury. nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2022 #54

Yup. How does that tie in? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #60

The bar is much higher for the DoJ. Heard of "beyond a reasonable doubt"? Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2022 #68

Yes understood. My point was only about scope and mission Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #69

Mr Meadows on the stand, actually answering questions..... jaxexpat Oct 2022 #33

It has been a wild success. Beastly Boy Oct 2022 #41

You made some good points except I hate that expression Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #48

We are probably talking about different outrage. Beastly Boy Oct 2022 #50

Think we've been disappointed over and over again Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #63

+1! ShazzieB Oct 2022 #76

Just give it up. The J6 committee can do that because they can't indict and don't indict Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2022 #53

If they can get a conviction on seditious conspiracy... kentuck Oct 2022 #5

Exactly. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #13

No Effete Snob Oct 2022 #36

How do you know that? kentuck Oct 2022 #40

Because I read the indictment Effete Snob Oct 2022 #42

Trump may be implicated. triron Oct 2022 #51

Well, then you go argue with the DoJ Effete Snob Oct 2022 #52

That doesn't exclude the defense from using that argument. triron Oct 2022 #56

That quote by Rhodes does sound rather incriminating... kentuck Oct 2022 #59

The DoJ is not aiming to make themselves look stupid Effete Snob Oct 2022 #61

Of course, they would not try to go after Donald Trump in this case. kentuck Oct 2022 #74

Yes, sure Effete Snob Oct 2022 #78

It makes sense... kentuck Oct 2022 #83

And... Effete Snob Oct 2022 #44

A witness could say something that is new evidence, you never know. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #45

Perry Mason moments throw a monkey wrench into the proceedings. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2022 #64

I thought you were going to say Garland will arrest Trump. Emile Oct 2022 #7

Roger Stone was the master mind of the J-6 US Capitol riots,... magicarpet Oct 2022 #9

And Rudy Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #22

Roger Stone was the master mind of the J-6 US Capitol riots,... magicarpet Oct 2022 #11

Well that's not what the DoJ is arguing today Effete Snob Oct 2022 #62

IMO Donald Trump will not be arrested for seditious conspiracy, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #14

There are other types of conspiracies Trump can be charged with, it doesn't have to be for sedition. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #17

Like what? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #23

Conspiracy to defraud the government. Conspiracy to commit election fraud. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #25

#2 and #3 !! Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2022 #70

True. First you legally establish that... CaptainTruth Oct 2022 #15

You get it, this trial is a really big deal. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #16

If so, that's a problem. Because the DOJ is explicitly and specifically keeping tfg out of it. Scrivener7 Oct 2022 #72

Fingers crossed... karin_sj Oct 2022 #24

K&R. William769 Oct 2022 #28

I know this is true when it comes to this trial. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #29

Is this trial gong to be televised? secondwind Oct 2022 #30

Kelly Meggs requested a bench trial at the last minute. DENIED blogslug Oct 2022 #31

The pressure must be a getting intense for the oath keepers. It's game time. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #32

Mark Meadows is the buffer gab13by13 Oct 2022 #34

Meadows may have already appeared before a grand jury. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #35

And then again, he may not have. Scrivener7 Oct 2022 #75

More tweets from Scott MacFarlane blogslug Oct 2022 #37

It's long past time to put this treasonous slob behind bars. lees1975 Oct 2022 #38

You're right but we have a weak DOJ. triron Oct 2022 #55

If we had a truly "just" justice system, Trump would be in jail for secret documents possession... Silent3 Oct 2022 #39

I fear you are correct. triron Oct 2022 #49

No. Not holding my breath for "Trump and his merry band of traitors will be in deep shit." progressoid Oct 2022 #43

... Lucinda Oct 2022 #57

Live Blog malaise Oct 2022 #58

Thanks! Found threadreaderapp link there, too. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2022 #65

Cool malaise Oct 2022 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Oct 2022 #67

lolz 867-5309. Oct 2022 #77

Same. nt BlackSkimmer Oct 2022 #79

Sounds serious. Torchlight Oct 2022 #80