General Discussion

Mike_in_LA

(186 posts)

27. You think that matters to them?

Reply to MarineCombatEngineer (Reply #7)

Sat Nov 19, 2022, 10:45 AM

Nov 2022

Having him on the Hill in front of their committees with or without answers keeps him from the case all the same.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

100 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holy shit! There may be another reason Garland appointed a Special Counsel. [View all] fightforfreedom Nov 2022 OP

Very astute thinking, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #1

My wife often laughs at me because she catches me in very deep thought. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #13

When I am in very deep thought, my wife often elbows me until I stop snoring. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2022 #41

My late wife used to yell at me when I was in deep thought, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #42

Wife wife stopped my deep thinking years ago. jaxexpat Nov 2022 #58

+1! Dustlawyer Nov 2022 #94

we call it bump-think....... getagrip_already Nov 2022 #45

That's how Yeats worked too! ananda Nov 2022 #61

Yeats markodochartaigh Nov 2022 #91

Wisdom! Roy Rolling Nov 2022 #96

This was a good post, you know. Good thinking about Garland's strategy and PatrickforB Nov 2022 #84

asswipes who will be questioning him, like jordan, are going to be suspects so certainot Nov 2022 #93

Garland did say that trump's announcing was ONE OF THE REASONS he was appointing a SC. HUAJIAO Nov 2022 #2

Don't forget that the repubs took back the house, I believe that is a big reason Bev54 Nov 2022 #59

I'd love to see enough of them arrested that they lose the House FoxNewsSucks Nov 2022 #68

That would be the soooo glorious, I try not to think about it, so no jinx. Bev54 Nov 2022 #71

and the Special Counsel has prosecutorial powers. agingdem Nov 2022 #72

I don't see these "hearings" going well NJCher Nov 2022 #76

Yep...... Lovie777 Nov 2022 #3

Defunding and then doing their own "investigating". KPN Nov 2022 #43

Can they defund the FBI???? Then what? We just don't have an FBI anymore. Maraya1969 Nov 2022 #75

Not Going To Happen ProfessorGAC Nov 2022 #80

As if they won't call Jack Smith in too? Mike_in_LA Nov 2022 #4

They can call, but he is forbidden to talk. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #6

They can't force him to answer questions, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #7

But they will do it anyway, just for theater. TNNurse Nov 2022 #11

Oh you're probably right, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #12

Something like Turbineguy Nov 2022 #63

+100. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #65

Ignore them. Slow walk it. Make them sue. paleotn Nov 2022 #24

You think that matters to them? Mike_in_LA Nov 2022 #27

See post 12. nt MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #30

It means nothing. Mike_in_LA Nov 2022 #48

Ok. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #51

LOL. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #52

At zero point did I suggest he is doing that Mike_in_LA Nov 2022 #89

They couldn't question Mueller while his work was ongoing. The point of a Special Counsel pnwmom Nov 2022 #81

Maybe you're right Mike_in_LA Nov 2022 #88

They can try. Doesn't mean he'll show up before the damage is done to their orange god. paleotn Nov 2022 #26

Precisely malaise Nov 2022 #5

Yeah, great... Garland should have already indicted, so I'm not impressed with CYA at this point. Goodheart Nov 2022 #8

Exactly this Farmer-Rick Nov 2022 #15

Prosecutors do not make decisions based on assumptions. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #16

And the assumption was? Farmer-Rick Nov 2022 #18

I am going to indict Trump now because he might run for president. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #23

Oh, so you think the pivot was due to Trump throwing in his hat? Farmer-Rick Nov 2022 #31

Too bad that those seats in NY were lost .. LenaBaby61 Nov 2022 #50

Lol, I'd like you to meet Special Counsel John Durham... Effete Snob Nov 2022 #19

Corrupt special counsel John Durham. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #25

The point being... Effete Snob Nov 2022 #34

I forgot about that A hole Farmer-Rick Nov 2022 #35

Apt comparison, but not for the reasons you think Fiendish Thingy Nov 2022 #66

And you have intimate knowledge of the investigation... paleotn Nov 2022 #29

Agree, this MAY be a brilliant move on his part onetexan Nov 2022 #9

And like they did Mueller Traildogbob Nov 2022 #10

I believe you are correct Rebl2 Nov 2022 #14

Same tired old RePug playbook - smear by an overwhelming # of NoMoreRepugs Nov 2022 #17

This is the first explanation I've read that made sense to me. CanonRay Nov 2022 #20

And some of those Congressional Rethugs may be targets paleotn Nov 2022 #21

Excellent point. Joinfortmill Nov 2022 #22

All I want to hear from Garland and the DOJ is nightwing1240 Nov 2022 #28

Pretty much got it kwijybo Nov 2022 #32

Perhaps any Dems who are subpoenaed RocRizzo55 Nov 2022 #33

Call me when the congresspeople who conspired usonian Nov 2022 #36

Yup, until such time it's mostly horseshit, gunsmoke, lateral slide, speculation and repeat. Magoo48 Nov 2022 #39

Is it too late to indict based on the Mueller Report obstruction? Thunderbeast Nov 2022 #37

statute of limitations has passed on those potential charges Grasswire2 Nov 2022 #78

Yup SheltieLover Nov 2022 #38

That is correct, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #40

Just like the 1940's. 1WorldHope Nov 2022 #44

All very good points, but one thing bothers me. sop Nov 2022 #46

The cons don't care about campaigns, they are trying to grab power by any means. onecaliberal Nov 2022 #57

I believe that only applies 60 days before an election. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #64

I believe Garland said BlueIdaho Nov 2022 #67

The DOJ's Election Sensitivities Rule generally prohibits investigations and prosecutions Lasher Nov 2022 #73

We have, IMHO, only 14 months to start a trial. Once the primaries start, no chance Garland does so Celerity Nov 2022 #95

Republicans have been good teachers on how to ignore house subpoenas. Emile Nov 2022 #47

Garland could slow walk their subpoenas too Captain Zero Nov 2022 #77

YESSS! I don't know why everyone is freaking out about this. FlyingPiggy Nov 2022 #49

+1000! ShazzieB Nov 2022 #53

+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2022 #55

Garland is protecting the investigations and coming prosecutions. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #54

I thought from the title of the OP that the other reason was an upcoming scotus vacancy... wiggs Nov 2022 #56

Yeah, we need to use a different wnylib Nov 2022 #85

Bill Barr True Blue American Nov 2022 #60

That was part of emptywheel's take yesterday Fiendish Thingy Nov 2022 #62

life IN the USA is becoming YoshidaYui Nov 2022 #69

Your not kidding. fightforfreedom Nov 2022 #70

Exactly. The Unmitigated Gall Nov 2022 #74

So the Fascist J6 House will not subpoena Jack Smith in their banana-republic style Justice matters. Nov 2022 #79

Very astute thinking! traitorsgalore Nov 2022 #87

Wow.. Excellent points! Cha Nov 2022 #82

I've been saying this for several days - not just here - and getting mocked. soldierant Nov 2022 #83

He can play games with them JustAnotherGen Nov 2022 #86

To me, they (GOP House) are fools for bringing this up since quite a few of them are guilty also of Samrob Nov 2022 #90

KICK nt Cha Nov 2022 #92

This message was self-deleted by its author Judi Lynn Nov 2022 #97

So glad to see your post! Thank you, fightforfreedom. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Judi Lynn Nov 2022 #98

I also Dorian Gray Nov 2022 #99

He did right, thank you for clearing the fog. Checkmate. Bluethroughu Nov 2022 #100