Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An indictment and a jury trial but no conviction? [View all]Justice matters.
(10,158 posts)27. Jury Selection In Criminal Cases
When selecting a jury, the federal or state district pulls names from a variety of sources, including registered voters, unemployment beneficiaries, and people with drivers licenses or state identification cards.
This is known as a jury pool and varies in size on a case-by-case basis. The potential jurors are selected at random by a computer program. If you are selected for jury duty, you will receive a notice in the mail that informs you of the date and time that you must attend court proceedings. There are various exemptions that can be made in order to get out of jury duty (usually based on health reasons), but in general, if you are selected for jury duty, you are required by law to attend.
After a jury pool is selected, the process of voir dire begins. This is when the attorneys and court begin to narrow down the pool to the jurors that will decide the case. Most states require anywhere from 6 to 12 people to be part of a jury, and up to 6 alternates are selected to take the place of the main jurors if needed. The potential jurors are moved in small groups to sit in the jury box, which is the box in the courtroom in which the jury sits during trial.
The voir dire process tends to vary from state to state, but it generally involves potential jurors being interviewed about their personal backgrounds. The judge and attorneys will ask about their beliefs and employment history to ensure that there isnt a conflict of interest with the case.
https://aizmanlaw.com/jury-selection-criminal-cases/
The voir dire process includes more scrutiny steps (read in full).
Glenn Kirschner said the DOJ is very good at detecting biased potential jurors.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes but are they good at detecting people vulnerable to bribery or blackmail?
Irish_Dem
Dec 2022
#30
TFG would never plead insanity; he's a narcissist and that would be too humiliating.
Ocelot II
Dec 2022
#11
No jury will find him not guilty unless the prosecutor hasn't prepared the case properly...
brooklynite
Dec 2022
#7
He has already lost his mojo. If he is indicted he will delay the trial as long as possible
Walleye
Dec 2022
#9
I think it's the only sensible approach, and you know he will put off the trial as long as possible
Walleye
Dec 2022
#19
If indicted March-April, trial wouldn't be until December at earliest, probably not until 2024
onenote
Dec 2022
#37
Garland could ask the DC Court to 'fast-track' procedures invoking primaries imminent.
Justice matters.
Dec 2022
#40
Would the DOJ appeal such verdict if the evidence is super incriminating? nt
Justice matters.
Dec 2022
#26
What if there are multiple charges (Counts) and one (or two, or more) of them gets a guilty verdict?
Justice matters.
Dec 2022
#42
I'd be very upset, but I'm not anticipating that. I think the jury verdict in the seditionist case
Vinca
Dec 2022
#35
I feel strongly that Trump should face multiple prosecutions in different venues.
Just A Box Of Rain
Dec 2022
#49