Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It never occured to me that in Bush V Gore the SCOTUS should have taken who won the popular vote [View all]edhopper
(35,227 posts)49. Scalia specifically said
it was not precedent and should not be used for any other cases. They broke the system with this unconstitutional ruling.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It never occured to me that in Bush V Gore the SCOTUS should have taken who won the popular vote [View all]
Maraya1969
Jun 2024
OP
Because they just gave the win to Bush. And they knew it. I think they should have taken into consideration
Maraya1969
Jun 2024
#8
In unofficial recounts after the dcision was made to stop the official recount....
Think. Again.
Jun 2024
#14
And there are also thoughts that Georgia purged its rolls, but got away with it.
GreenWave
Jun 2024
#57
2000 was not the first time a candidate won without winning the popular vote,
brooklynite
Jun 2024
#30
Is there any hard evidence that a full recount would have given the election to Gore?
Polybius
Jun 2024
#56
Well Jamie Raskin was the one who just brought it up. And I think he knows a bit about how things work
Maraya1969
Jun 2024
#9
He knows that the electoral college system is a broken approach. But that's not the same
onenote
Jun 2024
#36
Well, first of all, it is bush v Gore. Second, please be good enough to list one or
niyad
Jun 2024
#21
I would bet they did take it into account, but conservatives ignored it. Sure doesn't matter
Silent Type
Jun 2024
#7
If they took it into account, why didn't any of the four dissenters mention it?
onenote
Jun 2024
#35
Definitely agree we should do away with EC, but it won't happen. We have problems in 2024, 2000 is long gone.
Silent Type
Jun 2024
#46
It did the moment they, as federal SCOTUS judges, stepped into the case, overriding States rights.
LiberalLovinLug
Jun 2024
#18
They didn't need to take anything into account except counting every possible vote.
bullimiami
Jun 2024
#12
Ii think the election of the nation's first black president is what pushed a lot of them over the edge.
ShazzieB
Jun 2024
#27
Al Gore would have been a great president, as would have Hillary. Sucks big time. Cheaters will cheat.
C Moon
Jun 2024
#19
Remember hanging chads? Remember Gore's Saturday Night Live recap of his past 6 years as president?
fierywoman
Jun 2024
#25
A popular vote victory and a dollar will get you a pack of gum from the 99 cent store and a penny in your pocket.
WarGamer
Jun 2024
#26
I agree and think a simple solution to prevent it from happening again should have been passed in all states
karynnj
Jun 2024
#32
I bet everyone would have- as the other states were known- half of Florida means gore wins
karynnj
Jun 2024
#54