Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)WTF is going on at The Times? [View all]
https://digbysblog.net/2024/08/14/leader-of-what/I hope the NYTimes has cashed the check that pays for their horrific reporting. If djt and ilk get into power, that money will be worthless.
The spouses sharp eyes picked out a detail in a New York Times account of Ukraines surprise counterattack last week that sent its forces over the border into Russia:
You take some of our land, Vlad? Fine, well take some of yours.
But that account from Monday is not what raised the wifes ire. It was the story in Tuesdays The Morning briefing by German Lopez on what Ukraine hoped to gain from the incursion: to divert Russian troops from strategic locations, to improve Ukrainian morale, to impress Washington, and to shore up support abroad:
Some leaders, including Donald Trump? And Trump is the leader of what?
Which leaders want to cut off aid?
Whose voters are no longer as enthusiastic?
Ukrainian troops sliced easily through a thinly defended border, pushing tens of miles into Russia and shifting the narrative of the war after a glum year in which Ukraine had struggled, often in vain, to hold back Russian advances across its eastern front.
By Monday, Ukraines commanding general had told President Volodymyr Zelensky that his troops held 390 square miles of territory in Russias southeastern Kursk region. Two dozen settlements were overrun.
You take some of our land, Vlad? Fine, well take some of yours.
But that account from Monday is not what raised the wifes ire. It was the story in Tuesdays The Morning briefing by German Lopez on what Ukraine hoped to gain from the incursion: to divert Russian troops from strategic locations, to improve Ukrainian morale, to impress Washington, and to shore up support abroad:
Kyiv has relied on aid from Western nations to defend itself. But voters in those countries are no longer as enthusiastic about supplying Ukraine with weapons. Some leaders, including Donald Trump, have suggested they want to cut off the aid. A battlefield victory against Russia, even if its not strategically important, could get skittish supporters back on board.
Some leaders, including Donald Trump? And Trump is the leader of what?
Which leaders want to cut off aid?
Whose voters are no longer as enthusiastic?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
41 replies, 6552 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (129)
ReplyReply to this post
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You forgot a zero, it's over 1000 soldiers captured since this began, it was 400 the first day,, alone
Warpy
Aug 14
#19
It always has been. Remember, back in the days of segregation, Jim Crow, and lynch mobs...
JHB
Aug 14
#9
That's why a lot of Ukraine supporters on Xitter refer to it as the New Orc Times.
Crunchy Frog
Aug 14
#4
So.. no better than donald...just can't stand to be wrong to the point of no return...geez
PortTack
Aug 14
#20
Donold Trump and his congressional sycophants which are also Putin's puppets want the
Bev54
Aug 14
#11