Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
31. Maybe you are not aware of precisely what FDR did.
Wed May 1, 2013, 12:32 AM
May 2013

I love Churchill's history of WWII. It's six freaking thick volumes spanning from Hitler's climb to power until the end of the war. The story told there is full of FDR, with many of Churchill's correspondences with FDR reproduced. The story told in those pages is astounding. The world was coming apart like none of us here have ever seen. It took people like FDR, and Churchill, and others to put an end to world war.

The 1933 and 1936 elections were no fluke. After all, FDR became the only US president elected four times. People who grew up then adored him... For good reason.

Still, his opposition was tough. It took Pearl Harbor before he could get the US to commit to casting off isolationism, but then it was too late, we weren't just supporting our allies, we were at war ourselves.

Sheesh!

rec SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #1
Could you imagine 998 press conferences by President Obama? ProSense Apr 2013 #2
He could do group press conferences with Simpson, and Bowles MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #7
"I'll bet Simpson can tap dance real purdy." ProSense Apr 2013 #15
That's my guess. nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #16
hahaha!!! Blue Palasky Apr 2013 #17
Crap, I meant this as a response in a thread. MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #3
Which thread? n/t ProSense Apr 2013 #4
This one: MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #5
Imagine how different things were then. The press was it. NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #6
It was unthinkable before FDR did it MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #8
I'm sure he did, and it would still be useful today, moreso. NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #9
A prepared speech is somewhat different from answering pointed questions. MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #10
The Press was also very different then. RudynJack Apr 2013 #13
Actually, they did report that he was paralyzed. MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #14
If FDR were alive today and giving press conferences ProSense Apr 2013 #18
Perhaps. MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #19
He actually did have a strong congressional opposition. longship May 2013 #26
"But he also had a supportive Democratic congress." ProSense May 2013 #35
I wonder why it grew? quakerboy May 2013 #41
People likely didn't ProSense May 2013 #43
Technically, people have gotten smarter over the years quakerboy May 2013 #46
The Republicans invented the Great Depression Progressive dog May 2013 #55
There was radio. Lionel Mandrake Apr 2013 #20
I think President Obama ProSense Apr 2013 #22
And imagine how different ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2013 #30
I think what it shows between now and then (FDR's time).... ReRe May 2013 #32
The differences are completely lost on some davidpdx May 2013 #39
It was called leadership. Something we don't see anymore. rwsanders Apr 2013 #11
+1000 forestpath Apr 2013 #12
back when WE THE PEOPLE truly meant something Skittles May 2013 #29
we had statesmen who STOOD for office way back when datasuspect May 2013 #51
LEADERSHIP!!! bvar22 May 2013 #59
I'll confess to being taken aback at the recent deification of FDR. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #21
Say what? RobertEarl May 2013 #23
Which party are you with? DisgustipatedinCA May 2013 #24
FDR made plenty of mistakes MannyGoldstein May 2013 #25
Maybe you are not aware of precisely what FDR did. longship May 2013 #31
Are you buzzed? ReRe May 2013 #33
I'm afraid you've got it bass-ackwards, BC RufusTFirefly May 2013 #34
You're the only one who understood, but I didn't make it clear. Buzz Clik May 2013 #49
My mom was a teenager and young adult during FDR's presidency. JDPriestly May 2013 #42
You tell us: you voted for Reagan Starry Messenger May 2013 #45
Voted for Nixon, too. And Ron Paul against Reagan. Buzz Clik May 2013 #48
FDR: "I welcome their hatred" Doctor_J May 2013 #57
Especially when it is clear that AT THE TIME treestar May 2013 #63
Shame on you, Manny. If I had been at one of FDR's conferences, here is what I would've asked: RufusTFirefly May 2013 #27
Aw, don't feel so bad.... ReRe May 2013 #37
My side? RufusTFirefly May 2013 #40
Thanks... ReRe May 2013 #44
I got it, but sarcasm is tough to telegraph these days MannyGoldstein May 2013 #47
Fair enough. RufusTFirefly May 2013 #50
Behold: MannyGoldstein May 2013 #61
For the record, Manny: RufusTFirefly May 2013 #67
To be fair ashling May 2013 #28
But then, you gotta tell the truth! grahamhgreen May 2013 #36
Forgiven... ReRe May 2013 #38
Oh for a time machine, eh? MineralMan May 2013 #52
Wonder how FDR would have done with the internet........ Historic NY May 2013 #53
FDR's press conferences were different than the ones by the President nowadays. Cooley Hurd May 2013 #54
There werent very many women in those days, either. Shrike47 May 2013 #64
You would have thought FDR a corporatist at the time treestar May 2013 #56
He was a raging, unambiguous success for the 99%. That's my big issue. MannyGoldstein May 2013 #58
Still seems like a need to have a hero treestar May 2013 #62
So your argument is basically MannyGoldstein May 2013 #65
It is silly to pretend FDR would get your support treestar May 2013 #66
The problem is that the president doesn't seem to have Doctor_J May 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I was wrong about FDR hol...»Reply #31