General Discussion

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

43. Liberal Women, yes.

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:19 AM

Jun 2013

But not any like this bunch:

Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, center, sponsor of Senate Bill 5, is flanked by fellow Republicans during the second reading of the abortion bill on the House floor of the Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Sunday, June 23, 2013. If passed, the bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, require that they take place in surgical centers, and restrict where and when women can take abortion-inducing pills, would force 37 out of 42 abortion clinics in Texas to close and undergo millions of dollars in upgrades. (AP Photo/Statesman.com, Rodolfo Gonzalez)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This white man is plenty ready for women to take over [View all] MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 OP

I'm cool with that! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #1

Me too! Amonester Jun 2013 #17

Fembots aren't women Kennah Jun 2013 #27

The UK is way ahead of us, having elected Margaret Thatcher in 1979. Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #2

I'm limiting my enthusiasm to forces for good. nm MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #5

I predict that Hillary will run and Warren will enthusiastically endorse her (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #6

Hillary will run like she ran MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #8

You owe me a new keyboard Scootaloo Jun 2013 #31

Why would you praise UK example of electing a batshit crazy Tory Conservative on DU? idwiyo Jun 2013 #10

He needed to show Hillary in a good light MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #13

The point is, perhaps the policies of whoever "takes over" are more important Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #20

Yikes! H2O Man Jun 2013 #18

K&R idwiyo Jun 2013 #3

Well said Manny Marie Marie Jun 2013 #4

Amen! Or should that be Ah-WOMEN? calimary Jun 2013 #37

OMG - she tore him a new one. n/t ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #7

At least they might leave the Women's Rights thing alone and do something constuctive. BlueJazz Jun 2013 #9

Ummm...one small point, here. love_katz Jun 2013 #11

Oh sure, Bannakaffalatta Jun 2013 #12

Are you with the NSA? MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #15

LOL to both of you We People Jun 2013 #38

that's ridiculouis hfojvt Jun 2013 #21

Welcome to DU, Bannakaffalatta! calimary Jun 2013 #39

"Y" is 3/4ths of "X" mindwalker_i Jun 2013 #14

I'm ready for a woman if she's the right one LittleBlue Jun 2013 #16

Michael Moore =/= Mitt Romney FrodosPet Jun 2013 #25

so you will be voting Palin/Bachman in 2016? hfojvt Jun 2013 #19

Well naturally. They are women. What's not to love? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #22

Or Hillary/Pritzker? MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #23

I can't wait for women to take over. Aristus Jun 2013 #24

Work, work, work. That's what I'm about. Kennah Jun 2013 #29

No. Aristus Jun 2013 #30

My bad for not being clear. I was signing up for servitude as well. Think we can get a union? Kennah Jun 2013 #34

I guess so. Aristus Jun 2013 #40

I ain't settling for anything less than minimum wage Kennah Jun 2013 #45

I don't know... Aristus Jun 2013 #46

Well, if I were to be a Stay At Home Male Sex Slave, yes I'd be very willing to compromise. Kennah Jun 2013 #47

Oh no you don't. Y'all gotta get yourselves out of this. nolabear Jun 2013 #26

Until patriarchal religions invaded the female was the final say in an issue alittlelark Jun 2013 #28

The pool of candidates needs to be widened then narrowed josejimenez Jun 2013 #32

Some..... Deuce Jun 2013 #33

Texas women fucking rock! arely staircase Jun 2013 #35

Well, fuck me. cliffordu Jun 2013 #36

These women would have access only to the same powers treestar Jun 2013 #41

Hear, Hear !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #42

Liberal Women, yes. kentauros Jun 2013 #43

I Recced your OP, but with THIS Caveat: bvar22 Jun 2013 #44