Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should a Democrat always disagree with everything a Republican says? [View all]TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)10. Especially when in the process one ends up "standing with" many more TeaPubliKlans
and particularly a bunch who should be under a prison somewhere who take great glee in being war criminals.
When folks find themselves "standing with" Jon Yoo, Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, Donald Rumsfeld, and George Bush in order to oppose an unimportant Paul then maybe the entire lame ass logic is off the tracks and the guilt by association game is besides the point but then the debate would have to be about the policies and that can be tricky, especially when one is stuck with lots of appeals to authority and talking about trust.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should a Democrat always disagree with everything a Republican says? [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2013
OP
We should do what get us the most votes, what Republicans think is of little importance
NoOneMan
Jul 2013
#2
Paul disagreed with Bush all of his egregious policies both foreign and those 'laws' he managed
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#22
Ron Paul said he never voted for spending bills but made sure he attached his
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#71
Any other Republicans who opposed Bush's Wars? We certainly have plenty of Democrats
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#119
Especially when in the process one ends up "standing with" many more TeaPubliKlans
TheKentuckian
Jul 2013
#10
Especially when they have not a word to say about a Democratic President who apparently
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#23
Yes, I've tried over an over to get a response to my questions about this, but as you can see
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#34
Lol, well since I'm not even getting that anymore, I guess it has become too much of a problem
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#40
I just wish I could get an answer to my question, which I think is reasonable since
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#38
Don't know any libertarians on DU, but I sure know a LIBELtarian when I see one
whatchamacallit
Jul 2013
#58
Why has Obama appointed so many Republicans to his Cabinet in positions of power that we
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#24
My dislike is not for any person. Politics is not about 'persons', it is about policies. Your
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#133
We are not talking about A Reublican we are talking Republicans in Defense, in Economics, in
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#138
That's your proof that DU'ers call Pres Obama a Nazi "on a fairly regular basis?
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#59
The original post #14, stated calling Pres Obama a Nazi "happens right here on DU on a fairly regula
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#78
Neither you nor poster #14 provided any links showing any DU'ers calling Pres Obama
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#95
You claimed that DU posters called the President a Nazi. That is your stink. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#105
Um, no you didn't. But thanks for the proof that no DUer ever called the President a 'nazi'.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#142
In your response to post #42. Did you forget? Or did you think your clever wording would get by?
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#111
I made no such claim, and if you think I did, post a direct quotation with a link. nt
ucrdem
Jul 2013
#115
You're not going to like what is happening in Europe then if you don't like the very apt
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#144
??? That is an image from the Drudge Report, a despicable site to which I would never give a
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#148
You need to prove what you claimed. Hint ~ Duers called the President a Nazi.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#150
It makes a whole lot of difference to those who voted for Democrats rather than Republicans
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#43
You honestly think that Clapper, Mueller, Comey, Alexander, and Brennan changed
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#80
Oh bs. So effing sick of the excuses we have for everything that is wrong about this country.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#120
The long answer is that he had no choice. Those in charge told him who to appoint. That's why
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#112
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever,
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#27
OTHER: Yes, otherwise they will be skewered on DU for having ANY truck w/ GOP. ~nt
99th_Monkey
Jul 2013
#32
That is the lamest thing I have heard for a long time. Why would you appoint someone that is
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#113
They always have the option to fire him if he doesn't behave, just as they had
hughee99
Jul 2013
#114
Neither party should dismiss utility in favor of ideology or emotion. nt
AllINeedIsCoffee
Jul 2013
#67
The way I look at it Manny is that Republicans and any other malcontents are free to agree with me
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#97
With this current collection of Right Wingers, absolutely disagree with everything
MrScorpio
Jul 2013
#126
if certain Republicans are against spying on our own people- then I think we should support it
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#127
Apparently it's impossible to disagree with them once you're elected President ;^)
grahamhgreen
Jul 2013
#146