Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

9. I wouldn't say that was your intent and I understand your counterpoint

Reply to Happyhippychick (Reply #8)

Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:32 PM

Sep 2013

but, for the sake of completeness of discussion, these things get set-up on purpose. Remember, much the value of currency is its liquidity, to be there to take advantage of opportunities or cover expenses as they arise. If you keep it from moving off-shore it won't move on-shore either.

I would also add that, while not your intent, there are many who do carry the erroneous idea that it is possible to tax money outside US jurisdiction. If I unfairly saddled you with their errors I apologize.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congressional Spending is why the Debt Ceiling has to be raised. No other reason. [View all] riqster Sep 2013 OP

I would argue that the loopholes in the tax code are another reason Happyhippychick Sep 2013 #1

That is part of the same issue, and Congress's fault. riqster Sep 2013 #2

Yep. :) Happyhippychick Sep 2013 #3

Good point. kentuck Sep 2013 #4

"Super rich people are able to funnel their money off shore, as are corporations" Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #5

It never even occurred to me that we should force other nations to tax for us. Happyhippychick Sep 2013 #8

I wouldn't say that was your intent and I understand your counterpoint Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #9

Ah, got it. No apology necessary! :) Happyhippychick Sep 2013 #10

That's a feature of a bicameral system - it can get a deadlock muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #6

And they actually WILL "shoot the hostage". nt riqster Sep 2013 #7