Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Mass

(27,315 posts)

5. Yes, and I have no kids in school, therefore I should be able to not to pay for taxes for education,

Reply to Shemp Howard (Reply #3)

Sun Nov 10, 2013, 01:12 PM

Nov 2013

I wont need SNAPS, so I should not have to pay taxes for this

It is always so great to see RW views professed by self-proclaimed
progressives.

This is called solidarity, my friend. We all pay for everything in order to pay the risk. It makes me sick to read things like that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obamacare is not something you can purchase. [View all] Scuba Nov 2013 OP

k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #1

Kick! (nt) NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #2

I don't think it's that simple. Shemp Howard Nov 2013 #3

A la carte instead of bundled AndyA Nov 2013 #4

Yes, and I have no kids in school, therefore I should be able to not to pay for taxes for education, Mass Nov 2013 #5

I see your point, but... Shemp Howard Nov 2013 #6

The point is that we do not pay more because we pay for maternity or prescription drug Mass Nov 2013 #9

Bingo! Shemp Howard Nov 2013 #10

K&R great white snark Nov 2013 #7

There's a contradiction in that poster. LWolf Nov 2013 #8