General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If not Warren, then whom? If not now, then when? [View all]ancianita
(36,023 posts)Of course, they've got nothing, but we don't need them to use our party's or Hillary's policy stances to run some "opposition defiance disorder"-style campaign, either.
The media hype I speak of is the Republican MSM's use of the 'debate points' made by her primary opponents to run their bullshit negative ad campaign. I hate to have her primary opponents provide any brain power help to the biggest idiot party of the century.
Why doesn't someone just come right out and ask her why she's not sending messages to her party that she'll run? Perhaps her giving space for this president to have governance time and airtime is her consideration. Perhaps she wants to see how the House races play out. Perhaps she and the party know the optimum timing of such announcements and campaign commitments. I don't see anyone considering those reasons, but I think there's more going on behind the scenes for 2016 than anyone here sees or is willing to reveal, if they know. I sure don't.