Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
35. for starters
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:14 PM
Dec 2013

They were effectively ignored by the rest of the Democrats. That, and the racial purging is what really pissed me off, and why should we "suffer" forgetters?

Please excuse the long post, but this is so tragic, and must be remembered .

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0101/06/se.02.html

Special Event

Congressional Black Caucus Protests Electoral Vote Count

Aired January 6, 2001 - 2:00 p.m. ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

KYRA PHILLIPS, CNN ANCHOR: And if you're just joining us, we're going to go straight to the press conference we told you about with the Congressional Black Caucus with regard to the -- all right, we're working on getting audio for you in just a moment. And while we're doing that, I will recap just a bit.

If you're just joining us now, you are looking at live pictures of a Congressional Black Caucus press conference, with Eddie Bernice Johnson, Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson, active member of the Congressional Black Caucus, talking about why she objected not long ago, within the past half an hour, to -- or rather in the joint session with Vice President Al Gore, as they were counting the presidential votes for one last time.

We have audio. We're going to listen in.

REP. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON (D), TEXAS: ... black caucus, and I'm going to ask Mr. Hastings to give his opening statement, and I'll return.

REP. ALCEE HASTINGS (D), FLORIDA: Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

Today was a very solemn day, and the remarks are that many of us were not permitted, regretted by us all. Had I been given an opportunity to go forward with an appropriate objection, I would have indicated that because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to suppress voter turnout by unlawful means, I felt the necessity -- as do my colleagues from the Congressional Black Caucus, and other members of the House of Representatives -- to object to the kinds of errors against democracy, the holy grail of democracy, that were permitted in the state of Florida.

And we felt that they should not be tolerated, as they would not be tolerated in other countries. Indeed, we should not tolerate them in America.

I would have said to Vice President Gore that Harry Truman once said that what is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular. What we were doing here today is right. I hope all of our colleagues and the American people see it that way. And that is why we raised our objection. And it's a proud moment for the conscience of the House of Representatives, for those of us that are representing the entirety of the Congressional Black Caucus, in the presence of our chairlady, and the members here assembled, we stand proudly to say that we did what was right.

JOHNSON: Forty years ago, during the civil rights movement, I marched for justice with a firm belief that my son would not have to march, in order to utilize his voting rights. Much to my dismay, 40 years later, I find myself marching again, but this time for my grandchildren, so that they will not have to march in order to be afforded the same rights.

How long will we settle for injustice in America? How long will we have to fight to perfect the 15th Amendment? How long will we have to struggle for something that should be every American's birthright? On election day, 100 million Americans went to the polls to make their voices heard. Those voices want to be heard still. No hyper- technical manipulation of election laws should derail the intent of the voter.

We cannot sweep under the carpet the claims of first-time college voters who say they registered to vote, had voter registration cards in their hand, but when they were not allowed to vote at the polls, because their names were not on the roll, the lines were busy all over the country, where they tried to call to clarify their registration.

We cannot sweep this under the carpet, the cries of those who were incorrectly removed from the polling places in Florida by an inept Texas company hired by Mr. Bush's brother.

We cannot ignore believable stories of police intimidation, questionable activities by poll workers and simple ineptness by volunteers at the precincts. We cannot ignore what we saw with our own eyes on television: polls closing on voters in St. Louis, un- American voting lines in Pennsylvania and incredibly complex ballots in South Florida.

There is overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush did not win this election, either by national popular vote or the Florida popular vote. As members of Congress charged with defending the constitutional principles of this country, it is our duty to challenge this vote.

The vice president, in an incredibly statesmanlike effort to take the high road, has ruled against our challenge, so George W. Bush has managed to ascend to our nation's highest office. But he should be on notice that without justice, there can be no peace.

And we will ensure that there is no peace in this Congress until he truly reaches across party lines and corrects these wrongs. He must reach across party lines, racial lines, and philosophical lines. We see what's going on. There will simply be no peace until these problems can be corrected.

<snip>
--
Congressional Black Caucus press conference and listen in once again.

REP. CARRIE MEEK (D), FLORIDA: We dare not have it repeated. We dare not have the Tilden and the Rutherford Hayes situation repeated again, because it disenfranchised our people at that time.

This will disenfranchise -- it already has -- our people. We don't want that continued. We will always come out. We will always fight. We don't care who is it there.

We are very disappointed that our senators did not stand up and support us today. We helped to elect those senators. They will hear from us again, because we feel very disappointed that they didn't say we want our African-Americans, and our disjointed people who were not able to vote, to have someone in the halls of Congress to say, yes, give them a chance to debate this issue, so that the world could see what is happening here.

We have had our votes nullified. That's why we're so sad. They were nullified by defective voting machines, nullified by discriminantly distributed and targeted machinery, election machinery, in our neighborhoods. The votes were nullified by a purge of voting lists, undertaken by direction from a campaign that retained the equivalent of electoral thugs.

,
, one after the other, rose to their feet to object to the votes from Florida.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

AL GORE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: For what purpose does the gentleman from Florida, Mr. Deutsch, arise?

REP. PETER DEUTSCH (D), FLORIDA: To make point of order.

GORE: Gentleman will state his point of order.

DEUTSCH: Mr. President, we have just completed the closest election in American history. There are at least...

GORE: The gentleman will suspend. The chair is advised by the parliamentarian that under section 18 of title 3, United States Code, no debate is allowed in the joint session. If the gentleman has a point of order, please state the point of order.

DEUTSCH: Mr. President, there are many Americans who still believe that the results we are going to certify today are illegitimate.

GORE: The gentleman will suspend. If the gentleman from Florida has a point of order, he may state the point of order at this time. Otherwise, the gentleman will suspend.

DEUTSCH: I will note the absence of quorum and respectfully request that we delay the proceedings until quorum is present.

GORE: The chair is advised by the parliamentarian that section 17 of title 3, United States Code, prescribes a single procedure for resolution of either an objection to a certificate or other questions arising in the matter. That includes a point of order that a quorum is not present.

The chair rules on the advice of the parliamentarian that the point order that a quorum is not present is subject to the requirement that it be in writing and signed by both a member of the House of Representatives and a senator. Is the point of order in writing and signed not only by member of the House of representatives, but also a senator?

DEUTSCH: It is in writing, but I do not have a senator.

GORE: The point order may not be received.

HASTINGS: Mr. President, and I take great pride in calling you that, I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud and an attempt to suppress...

GORE: The chair...

HASTINGS: ... voter turnout.

GORE: The chair must remind members that under session 18 of title 3, United States Code, no debate is allowed in the joint session.

HASTINGS: Thank you, Mr. President.

To answer your question, Mr. President, the objection is in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives but not by a member of the Senate.

Thank you, Mr. President.

WATERS: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes.

GORE: Is the objection in writing and signed by member of the House and a senator?

WATERS: The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the Senate.

REP. BOB FILNER (D), CALIFORNIA: I have an objection to the electoral votes from Florida.

GORE: Is the objection in writing? Is it signed by a member of the House of Representatives and a senator?

FILNER: No, it is not in writing, but I rise in solidarity with my colleagues who have previously expressed their objection.

GORE: The chair thanks the gentleman from Illinois, but -- hey.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLACK: There were 13 objections in all, 12 from minority group members in the House of Representatives, last one saw was Bob Filner, who's a Democrat from California, a former professor, a big supporter of Al Gore, and clearly was just moved by the emotion of the moment.

They were all gavelled down. It was a great irony for the vice president. Here were some of his biggest supporters in the House of Representatives. He was clearly sympathetic, understood what they were trying to do, but he went right by the book. There was no debate allowed under the law that governs this joint session. There is also -- no objection can be heard unless it is signed by a House member and a senator.

Not a single senator would join members of the Congressional Black Caucus, much to their dismay. About a dozen members of the caucus walked out in protest, to protest the Florida vote, and then had a press conference in the gallery.

<snip>

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com


I can't tell if all of DU is infested with shit-stirrers, really bored or really drunk... Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #1
That scab is there because the wound never healed. riqster Dec 2013 #5
Short of time travel, how do we "deal with it?" Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #7
Actually, we agree. riqster Dec 2013 #9
Actually, I think the best way to deal with it ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #44
If the Democratic Party gives us a liberal candidate to support ... Laelth Dec 2013 #71
Not sure about that. riqster Dec 2013 #79
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #94
Well put. riqster Dec 2013 #101
And THAT ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #111
I don't see it as having lost. riqster Dec 2013 #113
That's because ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #114
Which is why these threads are necessary. riqster Dec 2013 #115
Agreed ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #116
Absolutely. riqster Dec 2013 #118
But it's NOT ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #90
Americans under 30 have a more favorable opinion of socialism than of capitalism. Laelth Dec 2013 #93
They will figure that out ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #96
I think the current Party establishment has a strong incentive ... Laelth Dec 2013 #97
Politicians are (largely) two things ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #99
I agree with your assessment about the nature of politicians. Laelth Dec 2013 #100
1StrongBlackMan keeps talking about PRIMARIES and you keep ignoring that Jim Lane Dec 2013 #120
Admittedly, I ignore the argument that primaries are valid. Laelth Dec 2013 #121
Hmmmmm. If the facts don't support them, why do they fit? nt el_bryanto Dec 2013 #2
Probably because I am such a contumacious SOB. nt riqster Dec 2013 #6
Yah. He said it here: MineralMan Dec 2013 #3
A critique from October 2000. riqster Dec 2013 #8
You know the drill.... libodem Dec 2013 #4
Since Nader is running (sarcasm) nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #10
The reason it COULD be stolen was the margin. riqster Dec 2013 #12
Explain all those elderly Jews voting for Buchanan nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #14
Math dictates otherwise. riqster Dec 2013 #16
Yup, why you keep ignoring nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #18
The fact is, you cannot put everything you care about into a single post. riqster Dec 2013 #21
As I said, experts in political science and history I have spoken to nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #24
See post 21, where I did define it. riqster Dec 2013 #30
What part of it does not matter are you purposely missing nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #36
The part which you just reposted. riqster Dec 2013 #43
You defined nothing, and you know why? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #49
So, you're OK with helping Republicans defeat Democrats, riqster Dec 2013 #52
You read that as you will nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #75
Once again, you mistake omission with lack of concern. riqster Dec 2013 #81
I said, you need to learn how to read nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #85
Oh, I read it all right. I just disagree. riqster Dec 2013 #87
Since you are comparing an illegal act with a legal act nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #88
one glaring fact that is NEVER addressed G_j Dec 2013 #23
Oh absolutely nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #25
Got facts to support that claim? riqster Dec 2013 #28
for starters G_j Dec 2013 #35
That proves that the Caucus and the minority community were fucked over. riqster Dec 2013 #38
The Great Florida Ex-Con Game G_j Dec 2013 #41
Also a factor. In fact, Rick Scott is trying to do it again. riqster Dec 2013 #45
I don't see why G_j Dec 2013 #47
You forget this, though: nyquil_man Dec 2013 #42
Oh, no argument there. riqster Dec 2013 #46
I just don't have a whole lot of use for Nader as a candidate. nyquil_man Dec 2013 #50
yet throughout this thread, you fail to address the culpability of 200,000+ registered dems.. frylock Dec 2013 #92
Because you can't cover everything in a single post. riqster Dec 2013 #104
nader was the least of the issues leading up to that theft.. frylock Dec 2013 #119
The Democrats are and have been trying to address most of the issues that caused the 2000 theft Gothmog Dec 2013 #126
You are of course familiar with the report issued on that Sept 11 nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #130
Yes, Al Gore was the real winner of 2000 elections Gothmog Dec 2013 #132
+1 progressoid Dec 2013 #20
Katherine Harris KamaAina Dec 2013 #62
Are they related? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #77
I seriously doubt it KamaAina Dec 2013 #78
I doubt it too nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #80
I am compelled to agree with you. LanternWaste Dec 2013 #129
Good article Gothmog Dec 2013 #11
And let's not forget Iraq. Iraq would never have happened under Al Gore, but some fell for the... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2013 #32
A great deal would be different Gothmog Dec 2013 #58
He and his supporters have blood on their hands. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2013 #64
If the Democrats want the votes of the left it should trying to appeal to the left. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #13
This. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #15
Nader didn't just run FOR Liberal votes. riqster Dec 2013 #17
And, the Democrats who voted for Dubya far outnumbered the Nader voters. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #54
The point is, be honest. riqster Dec 2013 #57
Democrats accept support from Republicans every election. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #59
With the avowed intent of getting Bush elected. nt riqster Dec 2013 #61
And, that's why voters voted for him? Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #63
Each of us is accountable for our own actions. riqster Dec 2013 #65
He's also responsible for letting the Democratic party know it has a left wing to contend with. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #67
A left wing of the party should be paid attention to. riqster Dec 2013 #105
You may be right...the party is still ignoring the left and running right. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #110
avowed intent would be nader saying "i'm doing this to get bush elected" frylock Dec 2013 #95
Read more of the source material. He said it. riqster Dec 2013 #103
I get real sick of people trying to rewrite history. CorrectOfCenter Dec 2013 #19
Is there evidence he's even running? nyquil_man Dec 2013 #22
Someone else who would do what Nader did. riqster Dec 2013 #27
When this Naderesque generic has a name, I'll worry. nyquil_man Dec 2013 #31
We'll probably see a repeat of this one: Tarheel_Dem Dec 2013 #34
People still cast ballots for Ralph? Arkana Dec 2013 #26
No, but his disciples pop up like dung heap mushrooms after a rain every cycle. riqster Dec 2013 #33
Am I the only one who doesn't read the Nader threads? Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #29
It's trolly, that kind of Nader-touting shit. Plus, the guy is pushing eighty. MADem Dec 2013 #37
LMAO! You're still compelled to evade the blame and makes excuses for Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #39
Another post that does not address the OP. riqster Dec 2013 #51
Sad and pathetic. Gore won the election as well, how'd that work out? Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #53
I am not prepared to accept the betrayal of Nader. riqster Dec 2013 #55
There was no betrayal, Nader is not a Democrat. The ubiquitous selective memory Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #66
+1, well put. Marr Dec 2013 #102
Substitute "Left" for "Democratic", if you prefer. riqster Dec 2013 #123
No, the Democratic Party fucked our shit up, by first failing to earn enough votes and then, Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #127
Uh-huh. riqster Dec 2013 #128
That's absolutely not what I said and you know it. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #134
If you support Nader's actions, my statement is a reasonable one. riqster Dec 2013 #135
HIs statement here is my answer to dilettantes who blithely call for destroying everything: freshwest Dec 2013 #40
Damn. This should be an OP. riqster Dec 2013 #48
You're welcome to steal any or all of it. The ideas and results matter, not sources or labels, IMO. freshwest Dec 2013 #72
Do you blog? riqster Dec 2013 #74
I've been asked to, but have no interest in learning another format and need to do other things. freshwest Dec 2013 #84
Billy Gibbons said something similar. riqster Dec 2013 #86
If only some Florida Dems would not have become traitors and voted for Bush Rex Dec 2013 #56
Ah yes, Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #60
And Nader had a vested interest in the Rethugs being elected, pnwmom Dec 2013 #68
I can't believe there are DUers who are still defending Nader. WTF?? Avalux Dec 2013 #69
Great post. sagat Dec 2013 #70
And one whose TOS calls for electing DEMS. riqster Dec 2013 #73
bluntandcranky is giving The People's View a run for its money whatchamacallit Dec 2013 #76
Really? There is something worse than The Peoples Spew? Rex Dec 2013 #82
Nope, all Nader did was pretend to be a liberal while he helped Bush steal elections. riqster Dec 2013 #122
You got your 'two minutes of hate' out of this thread. Rex Dec 2013 #124
I certainly got a lot of hate from the Nader contingent. riqster Dec 2013 #125
At least I know how to use an apostrophe. riqster Dec 2013 #83
you should be real proud frylock Dec 2013 #98
About Nader (and the Green Party in general), Jamaal510 Dec 2013 #89
I'm thinking the second option for some, the first for all too many. nt riqster Dec 2013 #108
Nader is as old as the crust on Rush Limbaugh's underwear. RBInMaine Dec 2013 #91
Both are toxic, even in small doses. nt riqster Dec 2013 #109
almost 40,000 people voted for someone other than bush, gore or nader in fl. gore lost by 154 KG Dec 2013 #106
But it makes for a good narrative in black and white. Celefin Dec 2013 #117
Fuck Nadir! BlueToTheBone Dec 2013 #107
I am not a fan of Nader. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #112
You want "blunt and cranky?" 1000words Dec 2013 #131
That is your right. riqster Dec 2013 #133
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sic semper Naderus. (A re...»Reply #35