Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,457 posts)
10. That is something I questioned too. It appears there are two laws/rules that come into play. The
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 04:15 PM
Dec 2013

first being the Vienna convention that sets rules for diplomatic staff and their employees. Apparently it states something to the effect of "prevailing wage" and "abiding by local laws". That is independent of the United States and not being questioned. I'm not sure if New York has the same caretaker laws as other parts of the country, but in-home caretakers often don't even need to meet minimum wage requirements. Also, paying minimum wage satisfies US laws. The number being quoted in this story is taken from what she claims she put on the Visa application. That doesn't have anything to do with minimum wage laws, but is a number used to determine visa status and to comply with Vienna convention guidelines. Also, the story I read on Reuters has said since the beginning the number used on the visa application is $9.73 an hour. Again, that's above NY minimum wage, but that number may have been the minimum needed to not be questioned under the Vienna guidelines since she was seeking a diplomatic staff support visa. So basically, the story isn't being reported correctly (quelle suprise) which is what makes me question the whole thing anyway. Someone like her being arrested is India is unfathomable. In India the authorities would have a hard time arresting her for murder much less this sort of thing so the Indian folks don't understand. Now people are given this anti-American b.s. about how she's required to pay her maid 40k per year. She's not required to pay her that, even under Vienna, so why is it in the story? Also, the pay issue isn't so much about the pay as about the fact that she lied about it on the visa application. Again, why would this woman even put 40k on the visa app? That part is likely bogus.

THANK YOU nt redqueen Dec 2013 #1
54K/year ($4500/month) is minimum wage in NYC? maxsolomon Dec 2013 #2
That is something I questioned too. It appears there are two laws/rules that come into play. The okaawhatever Dec 2013 #10
24/7 job? maybe it's not a 40 hour week? AllyCat Dec 2013 #19
May be a mistake in the article. gcomeau Dec 2013 #22
that's not unusual wage for nannies in NYC.. good ones anyway. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #24
Pretty sure the Nanny was expected to work 24/7 Marrah_G Dec 2013 #30
Wish I got paid to eat, sleep and shit joeglow3 Dec 2013 #36
Then you want to be a fireman. n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #38
That's not what the post said. ctsnowman Dec 2013 #51
Excellent Rudie malaise Dec 2013 #3
I went to India once. Women there are (mostly) like mistreated pets. What can I say?? BlueJazz Dec 2013 #4
Worse, they're servants to their inlaws Warpy Dec 2013 #6
I asked 2 women when I was there about various things...like you speak of.. BlueJazz Dec 2013 #9
i was there once. might get to go back in march. mopinko Dec 2013 #56
EGGGXACTLY!!! Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #5
Things I've been wondering about this case Proud Public Servant Dec 2013 #7
she owns some property in india, including getting it through fraud with her father JI7 Dec 2013 #15
That answered exactly zero of the questions joeglow3 Dec 2013 #37
You'd lose the bet. India takes very good care of its upper caste. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #27
$4500 a month is minimum wage in New York? arikara Dec 2013 #8
Probably not based on an 8 hour day Whisp Dec 2013 #11
when you count overtime . i'm guessing this wasn't just some 9-5 type thing JI7 Dec 2013 #13
That's about norm for a live in position where one is on call 24/7 Kaleva Dec 2013 #33
Super K & R SoapBox Dec 2013 #12
it should be made clear that what she was doing was pretty much Slavery JI7 Dec 2013 #14
Screw the promised amount. What she actually paid is a crime. riqster Dec 2013 #16
Perhaps I misunderstand. The fact that the diplomats home country mistreats women, their diplomats pampango Dec 2013 #17
she was not mistreated , mistreated is what she did to the woman she didn't want to pay JI7 Dec 2013 #20
Please, a foreign national woman was involved. RC Dec 2013 #25
As stated in the fucking OP, there are obviously big problems with how we treat people redqueen Dec 2013 #28
Exactly! ctsnowman Dec 2013 #52
Can't we do the X-ray thing onlyadream Dec 2013 #18
Rude Pundit, you are one of the best voices calling out misogyny evar! BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2013 #21
The Rude One nails it. TwilightGardener Dec 2013 #23
spot on, as usual.... mike_c Dec 2013 #26
Rude Pundit misses the point entirely as Fred Sanders Dec 2013 #29
No she didn't Marrah_G Dec 2013 #31
+1 nt Penicilino Dec 2013 #32
Maybe Not Leith Dec 2013 #34
She had limited diplomatic immunity that did not extend to this issue. stevenleser Dec 2013 #54
Diplomatic immunity leftynyc Dec 2013 #59
Bam! All the way to point! TRoN33 Dec 2013 #35
Dear India; lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #39
harsh - the status of women in a country should not exempt them from complaining Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #40
+1 nt Bonobo Dec 2013 #43
K&R. (nt) Kurovski Dec 2013 #41
The Rude Pundit fujiyama Dec 2013 #42
having slaves is not a non violent offense JI7 Dec 2013 #44
+1 XemaSab Dec 2013 #45
Exactly right: slavery is a form of violence. marble falls Dec 2013 #46
No, you really don't get it. redqueen Dec 2013 #55
The only issue involving her arrest is Did She Have Diplomatic Immunity? rpannier Dec 2013 #47
Wow Hekate Dec 2013 #48
The issue though atm isnt the treatment of women in india or if this women is or was a douchebag its cstanleytech Dec 2013 #49
Apparently she only had consular immunity. redqueen Dec 2013 #57
If thats true then hopefully this can be used to push for better treatment for more cstanleytech Dec 2013 #58
Hell yes, Rude. 99Forever Dec 2013 #50
Recommend jsr Dec 2013 #53
They should be protesting the low wages paid to the nanny, not the arrest. gtar100 Dec 2013 #60
So the strip search and body cavity search were justified? Is that the point here? Xipe Totec Dec 2013 #61
No, that's not the point. redqueen Dec 2013 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit: Photos T...»Reply #10