Have you contacted the Ready for Hillary! people? (Reply #58)

In the discussion thread: Hillary or Elizabeth? [View all]

Fri Dec 20, 2013, 08:08 AM

58. Have you contacted the Ready for Hillary! people?

I'm sure they'd like to hear that they shouldn't be spending millions on their efforts.

As to dividing Democrats... Based on the results of this thread, it looks like there's great unity.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

144 replies	Author	Time	Post
Hillary or Elizabeth? [View all]	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	OP
I voted Warren even though she would not be my first choice.	painesghost	Dec 2013	#1
How about Dean/Warren or Warren/Dean?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#5
I'd be for that combo! n/t	painesghost	Dec 2013	#11
Simpler solution...go with the candidate both Warren and Dean like	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#75
Can you point to a link	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#83
Nobody's endorsed anybody at this point.	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#90
Can you point to a link where Warren's asked Hillary to run?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#98
Why is that convoluted?...	socialist_n_TN	Dec 2013	#134
2014	JaneyVee	Dec 2013	#2
Warren, or someone who shares her views. n/t	winter is coming	Dec 2013	#3
LOL, Hillary? Really? nt	Logical	Dec 2013	#4
repost in 2 years	spanone	Dec 2013	#6
DU is consistently 2-3 years ahead of the Democratic Party in general	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#19
2014!	sheshe2	Dec 2013	#7
Have you sent a letter to the "Ready for Hillary" people?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#10
2014...	sheshe2	Dec 2013	#14
So you're OK with the Ready for Hillary People hurling cash	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#17
Rest assure the RFH people are chipping in for 2014 as well...	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#77
I think we can all multitask	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#112
Right she she!	treestar	Dec 2013	#56
Elizabeth!	LittleBlue	Dec 2013	#8
2014!	sheshe2	Dec 2013	#9
No to Hillary. Had enough of that crap. nt	Demo_Chris	Dec 2013	#12
Warren / De Blasio! nt	politichew	Dec 2013	#13
Oh, no you don't!	markpkessinger	Feb 2014	#144
The Hilllary fan club hates seeing the truth	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#15
This is an astonishing result	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#16
Warren appears genuine, honest and organic	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#21
delete- you aren't worth it.	KittyWampus	Dec 2013	#22
I was put on Earth to	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#27
"yeah, my guess is a lot of people most likely have you on ignore to avoid OP's such as this."	Capt. Obvious	Dec 2013	#59
It's kind of late at night. Maybe the Hillary supporters aren't night owls. n/t	winter is coming	Dec 2013	#23
Yeah-- over 50 people voted for Warren but...	TreasonousBastard	Dec 2013	#38
I think this is good evidence that DU is not necessarily a proper cross section of the electorate.	Gravitycollapse	Dec 2013	#43
I think that DU=Democratic Party	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#53
Manny, I have always found you to be politically perceptive (and funny as Hell)! But ...	11 Bravo	Dec 2013	#106
Did you read my message text?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#107
President Kucinich would disagree with you.	Throd	Dec 2013	#92
Hardly.	Orsino	Dec 2013	#69
Well...	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#121
I guess the takeaway is:	Orsino	Dec 2013	#140
Pot, meet the kettle.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#70
This shows just how deeply people can fool themselves	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#72
This site represents a minority within the party.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#84
Yeah, that's why its being renamed Green Anarchy Underground!	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#88
FYI, it's "toed" the line. As in stood by it. We're not pulling it to another location.	11 Bravo	Dec 2013	#109
I know that!	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#111
I don't doubt it, and I wasn't trying to be snarky. When I screw up ...	11 Bravo	Dec 2013	#113
That would be the minority that is more likely to donate time and money and talk politics	winter is coming	Dec 2013	#117
Maybe so, but these creative posts don't reflect reality.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#119
Three years before the election? It's a name-recognition contest.	winter is coming	Dec 2013	#127
And the truth is...a group of liberal bloggers doesn't like her?	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#74
Oh, I thought that was her base, no?	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#76
No, just pointing out the difference between the folks here...	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#79
Don't fool yourself into thinking DU is any exclusive and especially leftist group	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#82
Of course the reason NOT to do so is...she doesn't want to run.	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#89
Hillary hasn't exactly declared to the world yet that she wants to run	NoOneMan	Dec 2013	#91
Ah, but here's the difference...	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#125
I honestly don't think that Liz Warren will run.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#136
The same as 2008.	Chan790	Dec 2013	#132
Pointless poll. They aren't running against each other, and...	LuvLoogie	Dec 2013	#18
this	scheming daemons	Dec 2013	#54
Says who?	99Forever	Dec 2013	#129
If I had to choose between the two at this point	Cali_Democrat	Dec 2013	#20
What a strange poll, given that they have both said they are not running.	Nye Bevan	Dec 2013	#24
You may say I'm a dreamer.... nt	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#25
And you are not the only one ... n/t	Aerows	Dec 2013	#32
I hope some day you'll join us....	daleanime	Dec 2013	#34
And the world will live as one :) n/t	Aerows	Dec 2013	#36
And with that beautiful hope...	daleanime	Dec 2013	#39
Pleasant dreams, daleanime :)	Aerows	Dec 2013	#41
It's so far away that those who will be running in the primaries	treestar	Dec 2013	#57
Of the two I'd go with Warren by a mile,	LeftyMom	Dec 2013	#26
What foreign policy of Hillary's? Cozying up to foreign dictators who institute abusive policies against women?	InAbLuEsTaTe	Dec 2013	#45
Hillary. LOL...nt.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Dec 2013	#28
Yo Manny	Jesus Malverde	Dec 2013	#29
Warren	Aerows	Dec 2013	#30
Same state of mind, perhaps	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#31
Oh God, you are right	Aerows	Dec 2013	#33
Are you forgetting California and Oregon, two very liberal states.	JDPriestly	Dec 2013	#44
Yeah, you could make an argument for them too.	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#63
Glad to see Hillary supporters aren't as numerous as many threads indicate.	fbc	Dec 2013	#35
Maybe not on DU, but in the real world we are in the millions.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#71
I think the polls run by the media are fixed...	fadedrose	Dec 2013	#37
I'm not voting for her	Aerows	Dec 2013	#40
Yes, like MOM too. Doing great things for Maryland. Future star!	InAbLuEsTaTe	Dec 2013	#46
Warren/Davis	Aerows	Dec 2013	#42
The official narrative is deeply wounded.	Enthusiast	Dec 2013	#47
She's the only one who so far can challenge her.	joshcryer	Dec 2013	#48
Right now neither	davidpdx	Dec 2013	#49
This isn't hard ...	Scuba	Dec 2013	#50
If Warren runs she will have my full support.	joshcryer	Dec 2013	#51
k&r for Elizabeth Warren. n/t	Laelth	Dec 2013	#52
2014	treestar	Dec 2013	#55
Have you contacted the Ready for Hillary! people?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#58
It's still three years away and Hillary has not declared	treestar	Dec 2013	#61
2014.	Iggo	Dec 2013	#60
elizabeth. nt	xchrom	Dec 2013	#62
Elizabeth. No more Third Way bullshit.	NuclearDem	Dec 2013	#64
Hillary brings Bill	CFLDem	Dec 2013	#65
Well, that's OK...probably all the possible candidates have unsavory baggage besides Hillary.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Dec 2013	#67
K&R	fbc	Dec 2013	#66
Well, given that Warren has ruled out running...	Orsino	Dec 2013	#68
So has Hillary	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#81
You know perfectly well that this week she told Barbara Walters that she's thinking about it.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#86
Hmmm. So Hillary might change her mind, but Warren won't?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#100
Warren has been a senator for barely 10 months and never been in elected office.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#120
I guess there's no precedent for a first-term Senator running	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#122
That's not a good analogy.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#123
One great thing in Warren's favor is that	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#137
Fuck, yeah.	Orsino	Dec 2013	#141
Tick, tick tick...	brooklynite	Dec 2013	#73
Hillary's said she's not running in 2016	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#80
Maybe because she said this the other day ...	JoePhilly	Dec 2013	#94
So Warren's "no" counts, but Hillary's doesn't?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#97
Let me know when Warren says "maybe" ... lol.	JoePhilly	Dec 2013	#101
So Hillary running was laughable until 48 hours ago, then it wasn't.	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#103
Your desperation is what's laughable.	JoePhilly	Dec 2013	#104
Sorry, I'm a little confused here. Help me out.	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#105
I like this new "Politically Naive Manny" persona.	JoePhilly	Dec 2013	#108
It's a vehicle for pointing out hypocrisy nt	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2013	#115
Elizabeth	Liberalynn	Dec 2013	#78
Kucinich!...nt	SidDithers	Dec 2013	#85
Meanwhile, in the real world..........	Beacool	Dec 2013	#87
No more Clintons and no more Bushes. (n/t)	spin	Dec 2013	#93
Biden/ProSense	Scurrilous	Dec 2013	#95
That would also be a fine ticket, IMO.	closeupready	Dec 2013	#102
Not unless	ProSense	Dec 2013	#118
.	ProSense	Dec 2013	#116
Elizabeth Warren says what she means and means what she says. She doesn't play coy	Rowdyboy	Dec 2013	#96
hillary or elizabeth regarding what? nt	arely staircase	Dec 2013	#99
...	longship	Dec 2013	#110
It's going to be a looooong three years...........	Beacool	Dec 2013	#124
And Warren has already said multiple times that she will fulfill her commitment to MA in the Senate!	longship	Dec 2013	#131
2014 won't be funny.	Beacool	Dec 2013	#133
No way will Hillary ever be Queen in the UK.	dipsydoodle	Dec 2013	#114
2016 Obama - Biden	Reformed Bully	Dec 2013	#126
Not even close.	99Forever	Dec 2013	#128
Warren (nt)	bigwillq	Dec 2013	#130
i would like WArren but this poll means Hillary will probably easily win the nomination	JI7	Dec 2013	#135
What about a	blue14u	Dec 2013	#138
Some of you guys sound like drunken redneck gear heads arguing Chevy vs Mopar	LuvLoogie	Dec 2013	#139
I always liked	yuiyoshida	Dec 2013	#142
Do you have any idea how little any tiny self-selected poll means? n/t	pnwmom	Feb 2014	#143

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.