Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WTF is wrong with Bernie Sanders? Seriously. [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)52. It means
"Does this mean you favor the bill?"
...I see the flaws in the bill. Do I think it has the potential Senator Sanders decribed? Frankly no. A lot of the opposition was to the House version. The fact that, per the Merkley amendment, investors with incomes or net worth less than $100,000 are limited to 5 percent of their income and must be provided information helps. Senator Reeds amendment would have added more protection, but it was filibusted by Republicans.
<...>
Reeds amendment to strengthen the bill won 54 votes, however, 60 votes were needed to overcome a Republican filibuster and the amendment was blocked.
Today, Reed offered another amendment to require the SEC to include beneficial owners when tallying the shareholders of record in a company so that all companies count their shareholders accurately and cannot use gimmicks to avoid periodic reporting requirements.
According to the Associated Press, Reeds amendment tightens the definition of "shareholder" so that large companies can't ignore the thousands of beneficial owners the people who have the power to sell and vote on shares to stay under the SEC threshold for filing information. Reed said that under the House bill, companies can count only record holders such as brokers who sell the stock to thousands of beneficial owners in order to stay under the shareholder limit, set to rise from 500 to 2,000, for SEC registration.
Reeds efforts to help prevent financial fraud and abuse were backed by a strong coalition of consumer advocacy groups, including: the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA); state regulators; auditors; financial analysts; pension fund managers; the Consumer Federation of America, and AARP.
However, Reeds amendment was defeated by a voice vote and the underlying bill, which could open up the spigot to unsuspecting Americans getting solicited by unscrupulous brokers, passed on a vote of 73-26.
Speaking today on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Reed warned: By stripping away auditing standards and giving the investing public less information in almost every setting, sophisticated players and investment banks will have all the advantages.
The average investor will be operating in much more challenged circumstances. Middle-class Americans will be particularly affected.
- more -
http://www.reed.senate.gov/press/release/reed-ipo-deal-bad-for-consumers-could-harm-long-term-economic-growth
Reeds amendment to strengthen the bill won 54 votes, however, 60 votes were needed to overcome a Republican filibuster and the amendment was blocked.
Today, Reed offered another amendment to require the SEC to include beneficial owners when tallying the shareholders of record in a company so that all companies count their shareholders accurately and cannot use gimmicks to avoid periodic reporting requirements.
According to the Associated Press, Reeds amendment tightens the definition of "shareholder" so that large companies can't ignore the thousands of beneficial owners the people who have the power to sell and vote on shares to stay under the SEC threshold for filing information. Reed said that under the House bill, companies can count only record holders such as brokers who sell the stock to thousands of beneficial owners in order to stay under the shareholder limit, set to rise from 500 to 2,000, for SEC registration.
Reeds efforts to help prevent financial fraud and abuse were backed by a strong coalition of consumer advocacy groups, including: the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA); state regulators; auditors; financial analysts; pension fund managers; the Consumer Federation of America, and AARP.
However, Reeds amendment was defeated by a voice vote and the underlying bill, which could open up the spigot to unsuspecting Americans getting solicited by unscrupulous brokers, passed on a vote of 73-26.
Speaking today on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Reed warned: By stripping away auditing standards and giving the investing public less information in almost every setting, sophisticated players and investment banks will have all the advantages.
The average investor will be operating in much more challenged circumstances. Middle-class Americans will be particularly affected.
- more -
http://www.reed.senate.gov/press/release/reed-ipo-deal-bad-for-consumers-could-harm-long-term-economic-growth
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00051
The bill will likely end up in conference, which means there is time to fix it.
Everyone should contact their members of Congress.
Still, given that there is a massive package of regulation still being implemented, I doubt it will have the devastating impact being predicted.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002464969
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does that whining, unicorn-seeking socialist think - what? - there should be *more than one party?*
villager
Mar 2012
#1
Thanks for posting that so I could see the details of what was wrong with this bill.
grantcart
Mar 2012
#28
Manny, maybe you ought to actually LISTEN to what Bernie is saying,
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2012
#37
Manny, I have really come to enjoy your so very dry wit, makes me chuckle, and I need that
2banon
Mar 2012
#46
Bernie is a self-admited Democratic Socialist, such as the govt's in many European countries.
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2012
#36
Oh .... it's an article by Thomas Naylor, not a Counterpunch editorial. Thanks for the link!
Better Believe It
Mar 2012
#22
I wish there were more Bernie Sanders. He stands for what he believes in and the working people.
southernyankeebelle
Mar 2012
#31
WTF kind of poison pill is in THAT jobs act? You know there's gotta be one
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2012
#34
Only in this country do they have the audacity to sell a bill that further enables the swindlers as
mother earth
Mar 2012
#44
The JOBS Act: Joining the fine tradition of Healthy Forests, Clear Skies, and the PATRIOT ACT
RufusTFirefly
Mar 2012
#45