General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does the Big Bang breakthrough offer proof of God? [View all]politicman
(710 posts)I agree that science is never absolute and as such will continue for ever, but when scientists and people such as yourself dismiss legitimate questions of 'where did the energy for the big bang come from', then it is you guys that are shutting down discussion simply because you don't have an explanation for it, so you ridicule us believers.
I know that if a answer begs another question, then you continue to look for an answer for that new question, nit just posit the idea that something formed from nothing.
Similarly when we ask the question of why a certain amount of apes (or whatever you want to call them) only evolved, you guys used the answer that they evolved because they inhabited the Sahara where they were forced to end up walking and not climb trees.
But surely over millions of year there would have been batches of different apes that ended up in the Sahara and subsequently evolved, no?
We are told that only a certain batch that was forced into the Sahara because of lack of space in the forest evolved, but we are expected to believe that over millions of years that original batch was the only one that ended up in the Sahara?
I mean if on batch inhabited the Sahara at one point, surely more apes would have migrated to the Sahara in subsequent years, meaning that there should be a batch is a few year behind the original batch that evolved and so on?