Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
19. Right here at DU ...
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 07:13 PM
Apr 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101674947


http://www.democracyjournal.org/arguments/2013/09/politicians-think-american-voters-are-more-conservative-than-they-really-are.php

Americans are more liberal than either Republican or Democratic pols realize



When we compare what legislators believe their constituents want to their constituents’ actual views, we discover that politicians hold remarkably inaccurate perceptions. Pick an American state legislator at random, and chances are that he or she will have massive misperceptions about district views on big-ticket issues, typically missing the mark by 15 percentage points.

What is more, the mistakes legislators make tend to fall in one direction, giving U.S. politics a rightward tilt compared to what most voters say they want. As the following figures show, legislators usually believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. Our attitude measurements are most accurate on the questions about same sex marriage and universal health insurance – and in both instances the legislators’ guesses about their constituents’ views were 15-20 percent more conservative, on average, than the true public support for same-sex marriage or universal health care present in their districts.

Our study also found that politicians don’t learn in the normal course of events. After November 2012, we posed the same questions again to some candidates. Even after conducting campaigns and seeing the results, politicians did not arrive at more accurate perceptions of constituent views—not even those who had spent more time talking to voters. Much remains to be learned about why U.S. legislators think constituents are more conservative than they truly are, but researchers have found that politically active citizens tend to be wealthier and more conservative than others. Politicians who want to represent all the people in their districts need to keep this in mind.

Our findings also suggest that progressive groups might be able to use a simple lobbying strategy—just let legislators know the truth about what their constituents think and want! Most of the time, legislators will discover that their constituents are more liberal than they suppose. Would that lead to policy change? It is an open question, but some research suggests that public opinion can influence what politicians do. Perhaps helping representatives perceive their constituents correctly could pave the way for public policies closer to what Americans really want.


'Frank made the comments at a Democratic event encouraging Hillary Rodham Clinton to run.' onehandle Apr 2014 #1
well that explains why barney frank himself ran for president every time unblock Apr 2014 #2
You know he's gay, right? Dawgs Apr 2014 #5
of course, he's also way too liberal to win in this environment. unblock Apr 2014 #6
What environment is that? Scuba Apr 2014 #15
The environmental bubble created by Washington and shared Dragonfli Apr 2014 #17
Where did you get that idea? Auntie Bush Apr 2014 #18
Right here at DU ... Scuba Apr 2014 #19
Good post, thanks for your answer, but it doesn't say the public is far left of the Dem party. Auntie Bush Apr 2014 #20
Yes, a subtle difference. But I interpreted more as the public being left of .... Scuba Apr 2014 #21
Yes we are! Why don't politicians get it? Auntie Bush Apr 2014 #22
The people who bribe, er, I mean, fund their campaigns, don't allow them to "get it". Scuba Apr 2014 #23
Well, Scuba certainly gets it, +1 dreamnightwind May 2014 #31
Then why don't we hold 75% of both Houses? Reter Apr 2014 #25
"We" don't hold either the House or the Senate. The oligarchs have them both. Scuba Apr 2014 #27
the environment wherein big money destroys anyone who tries to represent actual people unblock May 2014 #35
you have put your finger on his logical flaw Enrique Apr 2014 #8
He had actually wanted to be Speaker someday but his being gay made that a non starter dsc May 2014 #32
Did he say *when*? DirkGently Apr 2014 #3
Warren admits to signing the letter urging Hillary to run Cali_Democrat Apr 2014 #4
... Capt. Obvious May 2014 #34
Too bad his opinion is outweighed by that of another prominent liberal... Elizabeth Warren scheming daemons Apr 2014 #7
I love Barney, but he and EW thought Deval would put Barney in John Kerry's seat as a placeholder. MADem Apr 2014 #9
Well...then, maybe I should put "Warren for 2016" back as my Signature Line? KoKo Apr 2014 #10
You heard it here first: ProSense Apr 2014 #11
Whoa! It's gonna get crowded under the bus! You with me, ProSense? I've got popcorn. n/t freshwest May 2014 #29
I hope she runs, if for nothing else than to move the conversation a bit Dragonfli Apr 2014 #12
Well said. Laelth Apr 2014 #14
I doubt they are being read, possibly quickly scanned by a staffer before Dragonfli Apr 2014 #16
k&r for Elizabeth Warren. n/t Laelth Apr 2014 #13
Damn him! Why are all these progressives talking about Warren? quinnox Apr 2014 #24
He didn't say 2016 though.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #26
Let us hope so donco Apr 2014 #28
K&R cprise May 2014 #30
I read on another thread Snowden will be her running mate Capt. Obvious May 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Barney Frank thinks Warre...»Reply #19