Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wikileaks Ukraine cable proves US government knew of fascist threat [View all]jakeXT
(10,575 posts)71. They are still cooperating with NATO on Afghanistan supplies, but in 2010 they also posted their
military doctrine.
The new Russian Military Doctrine (in Russian at http://news.kremlin.ru/ref_notes/461) listed under the heading of "Main external threats of war" the following concerns, with the most pressing first:
- The goal of NATO to arrogate to itself the assumption of global functions in violation of international law, and to expand the military infrastructure of NATO nations to Russia's borders including through expansion of the bloc
- Attempts to destabilize the situation in individual states and regions and the undermining of strategic stability
- The deployment of military contingents of foreign states (and blocs) on territories neighboring Russia and its allies, as well as in adjacent waters
- The establishment and deployment of strategic missile defense systems that undermine global stability and violate the balance of forces in the nuclear field, as well as the militarization of outer space and the deployment of strategic non-nuclear systems precision weapons
- Territorial claims against Russia and its allies and interference in their internal affairs
- The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, missiles and missile technology, increasing the number of states possessing nuclear weapons
- The violation by a state of international agreements, and failure to ratify and implement previously signed international treaties on arms limitation and reduction
- The use of military force in the territories of states bordering Russia in violation of the UN Charter and other norms of international law
- The escalation of armed conflicts on territories neighboring Russia and allied nations
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/NATO/NATO_Expansion_Russia.html
- The goal of NATO to arrogate to itself the assumption of global functions in violation of international law, and to expand the military infrastructure of NATO nations to Russia's borders including through expansion of the bloc
- Attempts to destabilize the situation in individual states and regions and the undermining of strategic stability
- The deployment of military contingents of foreign states (and blocs) on territories neighboring Russia and its allies, as well as in adjacent waters
- The establishment and deployment of strategic missile defense systems that undermine global stability and violate the balance of forces in the nuclear field, as well as the militarization of outer space and the deployment of strategic non-nuclear systems precision weapons
- Territorial claims against Russia and its allies and interference in their internal affairs
- The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, missiles and missile technology, increasing the number of states possessing nuclear weapons
- The violation by a state of international agreements, and failure to ratify and implement previously signed international treaties on arms limitation and reduction
- The use of military force in the territories of states bordering Russia in violation of the UN Charter and other norms of international law
- The escalation of armed conflicts on territories neighboring Russia and allied nations
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/NATO/NATO_Expansion_Russia.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wikileaks Ukraine cable proves US government knew of fascist threat [View all]
go west young man
May 2014
OP
Couldn't your question be asked completely in reverse to the Kiev coup?
go west young man
May 2014
#80
Do you support Coup D'etats in Democracies as a way to remove leaders? Should we have done that
sabrina 1
May 2014
#103
There was a coup in Ukraine and a president was installed without the consent of a majority of the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#148
Why is Blackwater in Ukraine? There was a coup, the president is not elected. My question was 'who
sabrina 1
May 2014
#120
There Is No Proof They Are, Ma'am: That Is A Sort Of 'Gish-Gallop', Really
The Magistrate
May 2014
#122
My question was simple, 'who elected the President of Ukraine' and you went off into the parliament
sabrina 1
May 2014
#127
My position in my opinion, is based on a gathering of facts from multiple sources across the globe.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#131
Your Position, Ma'am, Is Neither Consistent, Nor Grounded In Realities Of Governance and Revolution
The Magistrate
May 2014
#133
You can't have it both ways. On the one hand, you claim that the government is 'legitimate because
sabrina 1
May 2014
#134
You Are Attempting To Be Reasonable, Ma'am, But Still Distorting Facts Grotesquely
The Magistrate
May 2014
#147
I am speaking the truth. One doesn't have to struggle too hard to tell the truth. It simply is
sabrina 1
May 2014
#149
There is certainly huge resistance to what normally Democrats would be all over, as they were during
sabrina 1
May 2014
#128
No elected Parliament in a Democratic Nation would condone a Coup of the duly elected President.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#130
'A Rose By Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet'! Of course they change their NAME but they still
sabrina 1
May 2014
#132
If they are, it's the same reason they're anywhere else: someone's paying them to be
Recursion
May 2014
#146
Too late for an election AFTER a coup, don't you think? It's clear that at least half the country
sabrina 1
May 2014
#144
"the US is backing and financing extremely violent right wing nationalist fascists"
Zorra
May 2014
#2
I did not see that quote in the post. Did I miss it or is it from somewhere else? n/t
pampango
May 2014
#13
"But supporting a government that also happens to include right-wing fascists is not putting..
Cha
May 2014
#100
People are dying on both sides...that is obvious to the most basic simpleton...
go west young man
May 2014
#60
I would suggest to Putin that annexing eastern Ukraine will bring NATO to his border.
pampango
May 2014
#12
Will that change the fact that the cable is from 2008 and the OP is pro-Russian spin? n/t
ProSense
May 2014
#70
They are still cooperating with NATO on Afghanistan supplies, but in 2010 they also posted their
jakeXT
May 2014
#71
There are different kind of stages of involvement, Sweden for example has participated in NATO
jakeXT
May 2014
#86
Some observers like Kucinich or Cohen didn't trust the military part, maybe Russia did too
jakeXT
May 2014
#88
Well this is what happened with the new 'legitimate' government in Parliment today.
Obnoxious_One
May 2014
#107
For some reason you think that being anti-nazi equates to thinking that America should
Obnoxious_One
May 2014
#109
Yes I call people that burn people alive and murder them animals, read the article from #65.
Obnoxious_One
May 2014
#111