Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
12. He did go through the permit process.
Sun May 18, 2014, 09:46 AM
May 2014

If you read the story, he was even granted the permits, then for reasons unstated, the state later changed its mind, and revoked them.

The problem is they don't have the same policy when it comes to other natural resources Major Nikon May 2014 #1
Actually, they do. JayhawkSD May 2014 #14
This is only in regards to the manner of collection Major Nikon May 2014 #16
Good point. JayhawkSD May 2014 #47
Anti-government greedy asshole who is willing to deprive his downstream neighbors hobbit709 May 2014 #2
I didn't see anything in the article about neighbors downstreams not having enough water. n/t hughee99 May 2014 #23
Damn up a runoff, what do you think happens. hobbit709 May 2014 #25
"Less water" isn't the same as "not enough" water. hughee99 May 2014 #41
If his homemade dams break Cirque du So-What May 2014 #29
What 'homemade dams'? Jenoch May 2014 #45
Prosecuted, pleaded guilty, fined, kept collecting water. struggle4progress May 2014 #38
Previous DU threads... SidDithers May 2014 #3
Interesting malaise May 2014 #4
Greedy, isn't he? He was denying everyone down stream or disturbing the water table. OTT. freshwest May 2014 #51
Every farmer I know in Missouri has built ponds on their land. Is it the.... Logical May 2014 #5
Precisely n/t malaise May 2014 #7
It's the lack of a permit that's the issue Major Nikon May 2014 #20
He did have a permit but it was revoked when he prevented water from reaching tributaries. randome May 2014 #21
I read it Major Nikon May 2014 #22
Agreed. randome May 2014 #34
He dammed tributaries to a river struggle4progress May 2014 #24
OK, thanks, that makes sense now. nt Logical May 2014 #30
Harvesting rainwater should not be a crime Generic Other May 2014 #6
Well, I think the size is an issue. Farmers have ponds. Not huge reservoirs. nt Logical May 2014 #9
How much is a "pond" FBaggins May 2014 #52
Water is a part of the public commons. He does not own that water, so he's a thief. MohRokTah May 2014 #10
He did go through the permit process. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #12
Times change Leme May 2014 #15
Certainly. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #17
Reservoir is a generic term... Wounded Bear May 2014 #31
Harrington Conviction and Sentence for 11 Years of Illegal Water Use struggle4progress May 2014 #35
Didn't the Bushes buy water rights in South America? Generic Other May 2014 #18
South isn't North. WinkyDink May 2014 #28
He was damming tributaries. And yes, size matters. nt Ilsa May 2014 #42
Damming tributaries is another matter Generic Other May 2014 #44
It's not going to filter down if he collects it. randome May 2014 #11
Nothing in the story suggests that his neighbours feel deprived. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #13
Under old law, the water rights belong to the city of Medford, which went to court some time ago struggle4progress May 2014 #37
By capturing and storing 13 million gallons of rain water, Maedhros May 2014 #40
Jake Gittes nearly lost his nose Recursion May 2014 #50
it's not illegal to set up systems on your roof WhiteTara May 2014 #43
The guy sounds like a Libertarian extreme prepper to me. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #8
Story's two years old. Here's a different take: struggle4progress May 2014 #19
Big Butte. Orrex May 2014 #27
Perhaps you meant Big Southern Butte? struggle4progress May 2014 #33
Water Hoarders Shankapotomus May 2014 #26
trout do not like dammed rivers AngryAmish May 2014 #32
I can't see any creeks/rivers that he is blocking. Go Vols May 2014 #36
He agreed twice he was breaking the law by pleading guilty; and in the third prosecution struggle4progress May 2014 #39
He's diverting water from the littorals by capturing it Recursion May 2014 #49
The evidence appears to be damning. Or is that damming? (nt) Nye Bevan May 2014 #46
Don't rain on this parade. randome May 2014 #53
The desiccated rich? Recursion May 2014 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who needs 13 million gall...»Reply #12