General Discussion

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)

58. If that's the way they wish to take it

Mon May 19, 2014, 05:49 AM

May 2014

I prefer to send a national message. Equality is good for business.

Spend money in Houston, a good deal of money will still end up in state coffers. There are plenty of cities in states that support LGBT rights (and reproduction rights for women) that could use that money. Most of the suggestions I've read on this thread as possible sites for the DNC are among the most repressive places in the nation for the rights of women and gays. You know what that tells me -- and I'm speaking only for myself -- that when it comes right down to it, rights for women and LGBTs don't count for much if it gets in the way of a good party. I thought the convention was about selecting the next nominee for President, not the preferred places to get wasted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why are they considering Salt Lake City for our '16 national convention? [View all] Ken Burch May 2014 OP

I'm hoping for Miami. AZ Mike May 2014 #1

SLC is, as usual for big cities in red states, quite liberal. Warpy May 2014 #2

I know about Rocky and SLC. Ken Burch May 2014 #6

I don't think they have any illusions about flipping the whole state Warpy May 2014 #9

Denver hosted DNC 2008, so we're out of the running. politicat May 2014 #36

Not so fast. NYC had it in 1976, 1980, and 1992. Jim Lane May 2014 #51

Uh... Maybe. politicat May 2014 #53

I feel bad that you wrote that whole post and the 10-30 million was a joke alcibiades_mystery May 2014 #54

I considered it a serious question, worth considering -- and caught the "American Spring" reference. politicat May 2014 #55

Left-flank challenge? I agree. Do it by protests outside the convention? I disagree. Jim Lane May 2014 #56

The RNC Is Considering Denver otohara May 2014 #62

I know. politicat May 2014 #63

"deep blue NM"? What about Tejana Susana? KamaAina May 2014 #64

I think her last name swept her into power, along with her law'n'order past Warpy May 2014 #67

Salt LAke City is the WORST possible location. MohRokTah May 2014 #3

How so? pinto May 2014 #5

When you make a sweeping statement like that Warpy May 2014 #10

I don't know what his reasoning is, but Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #31

Agreed. It would feel like a slap in the face- ecstatic May 2014 #60

It would depress the base. MohRokTah May 2014 #34

I've no clue to how the choice is made. Any idea? pinto May 2014 #4

Is there any evidence these things even provide much bump anyway to the host state? davidn3600 May 2014 #7

They help the state parties some, but that doesn't pay off for years Recursion May 2014 #43

because where one holds a convention usually doesn't affect the election in that state JI7 May 2014 #8

It's liberal – really??? snot May 2014 #13

i'm talking about salt lake city itself, not the entire state of utah JI7 May 2014 #15

I know; but I've been to SLC, and would not have guessed it was generally liberal. snot May 2014 #17

what do you consider liberal ? JI7 May 2014 #19

Well, to set a fairly low bar, did a majority of the city vote for Obama? snot May 2014 #20

in 2008 they did, not sure about 2012 but i think it could be because JI7 May 2014 #21

Look up Rocky Anderson. Drunken Irishman May 2014 #22

ABC's "What Would You Do" show filmed an episode in various Utah ecstatic May 2014 #61

I'd say two reasons--outreach and hotel rooms/venues. MADem May 2014 #11

Wasn't the 2008 convention held in Denver? boston bean May 2014 #35

Because it would keep the protests to a minimum. LeftyMom May 2014 #12

How, why? snot May 2014 #14

Probably because you have to travel a long way to get there Ken Burch May 2014 #16

Hardly anybody lives in driving distance. LeftyMom May 2014 #18

Are there places to camp out near town? Ken Burch May 2014 #25

There's tons of camping. LeftyMom May 2014 #27

Who would be protesting? If it is Republicans, who cares. yeoman6987 May 2014 #52

Salt Lake City won't get the convention... Drunken Irishman May 2014 #23

BUT I'd say Salt Lake is an option because of its location... Drunken Irishman May 2014 #24

SLC could work out great moonbeam23 May 2014 #26

I live in SLC defacto7 May 2014 #28

Byzantine Alcohol Laws and 3.2% beer will kill any chance of a convention in SLC. Exposethefrauds May 2014 #29

I know I'm going to get pummeled for saying this davidpdx May 2014 #30

I don't think that's such a bad idea. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #32

How is Texas purpling? kwolf68 May 2014 #48

The thing to keep in mind is the minority population is rising in Texas davidpdx May 2014 #57

San Antonio may be better. alarimer May 2014 #45

Or Houston KamaAina May 2014 #65

Any state that does not recognize full human rights for its LGBTI citizens... theHandpuppet May 2014 #33

that would be a brand new standard dsc May 2014 #37

Good. It should be the new standard. theHandpuppet May 2014 #39

I think it should be more by city than by state dsc May 2014 #46

The states' anti-gay laws don't apply to their cities? theHandpuppet May 2014 #49

but then the message you are sending to the likes of Houston dsc May 2014 #50

If that's the way they wish to take it theHandpuppet May 2014 #58

I have never been to any of the above city dsc May 2014 #59

Not that anyone, apparently, gives a damn. theHandpuppet May 2014 #38

For the same reason it was in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte the last time Fumesucker May 2014 #40

Maybe it should be in PA. Except for President Obama carrying PA twice, it is a "red" state. AlinPA May 2014 #41

Mostly because the convention location never really matters Recursion May 2014 #42

I doubt very much that SLC will get the nod. MineralMan May 2014 #44

SLC would be perfect. You can fly in get your luggage, check in a hotel, and be skiing within an CK_John May 2014 #47

Is skiing popular in Utah during the summer? Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #66