Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
91. Would include Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jun 2014

In 2008, she refused to endorse Democrats in Florida, and was seen at fundraisers for her Republican "colleagues".

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the co-chair of the Democratic Red to Blue committee at that time, refused to endorse of campaign for the following 3 Democratic challengers for Republican seats:

Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia

Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez

Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo

All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.




FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>

Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.

While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:

But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. [...]

This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.

"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.

Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:

The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.

http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537








The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.

They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."

This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html


Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing



A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly,
and don't forget them easily.

---bvar22
cursed with a memory



Rule #1, there is no such animal as a DINO MohRokTah Jun 2014 #1
So if Ted Cruz or Louis Gohmert became Democrats, MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #3
Damned straight I'd be down with that. MohRokTah Jun 2014 #11
I'm sure we have members like them in the Democratic Party Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2014 #107
So, you would have voted for George Wallace. Luminous Animal Jun 2014 #16
Nope MohRokTah Jun 2014 #19
If you reject the majority of the platform, you have no place. joshcryer Jun 2014 #51
At one point a few years ago, a Dem congressman from the South Ken Burch Jun 2014 #63
I seem to recall 'independent' Lieberman got a lot of support Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #117
Does a Democrat support Ayn Rand's philosophy? JDPriestly Jun 2014 #64
with the way that the parties are shifting right-ward, I call myself more a "liberal" than "Democrat NRaleighLiberal Jun 2014 #2
I hear you! nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #8
I'm with you on that. I consider myself a Liberal who votes Democrat. bluesbassman Jun 2014 #45
Easy answer: when they vote for other-than-Democrats Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #4
So it's basically color war? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #5
No Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #6
Seems like it's exactly color war MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #7
It seems like that because that's actually the argument being made. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #13
Right. So what makes a democrat? Is the only requirement "not republican?' Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #26
What makes a Democrat is the party ideology. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #30
Right. I think the point of the OP might be that the tent is too big. Does the third way represent Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #31
One can be a liberal/progressive/socialist and vote for non-Democrats, but pampango Jun 2014 #77
It's evolution. LWolf Jun 2014 #9
Move over - I am under the bus as well... NRaleighLiberal Jun 2014 #10
It's getting crowded under hear. LWolf Jun 2014 #21
I guess some are comfortable with the changing beliefs of the party. I certainly am not. I voted liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #12
When they would have preferred that McCain had won instead of Obama...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #14
What would have been different? leftstreet Jun 2014 #17
Supreme Court would look different. Nt seabeyond Jun 2014 #20
The SC that just said anti-abortion whacks can...nevermind leftstreet Jun 2014 #23
And we'd be fight 2 or 3 more wars. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #24
i think so. i do not know what will happen in iraq, but i think obama's history with these seabeyond Jun 2014 #29
Aca, doma. Betcha Syria, Libya would look different. Iraq and afg worse. Nt seabeyond Jun 2014 #22
The GOP could NEVER have passed mandated health insurance leftstreet Jun 2014 #25
And yet, Romney got something similar passed in Massachusetts Art_from_Ark Jun 2014 #35
The GOP was hated in 2008 leftstreet Jun 2014 #37
And yet, the GOP bounced back in 2010 Art_from_Ark Jun 2014 #40
i am sure those that have pre existing are not gonna really agree with you, you think? nt seabeyond Jun 2014 #43
It's a pretty complex situation Art_from_Ark Jun 2014 #52
Took the Dems 2 yrs to make 'em viable again leftstreet Jun 2014 #48
Well, the Dems were able to establish 40 years of House control Art_from_Ark Jun 2014 #55
It was cooked up by the far-right Heritage Foundation. nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #41
Don't ask, don't tell would still be in place KamaAina Jun 2014 #106
Right now, I prefer that Elizabeth Warren win, not Hillary Clinton. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #66
+1 Scuba Jun 2014 #69
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #96
... winter is coming Jun 2014 #15
When they're actually just an agent provocateur? frazzled Jun 2014 #18
When they never actually vote for Democrats and encourage other people not to do so. pnwmom Jun 2014 #27
Zell Miller. Liberal Veteran Jun 2014 #28
So the NJ Democratic leadership who endorsed Christie... MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #32
A fair point, but Miller crossed the line. And not endorsing a candidate is beside the point. Liberal Veteran Jun 2014 #34
Would include Debbie Wasserman Schultz? bvar22 Jun 2014 #91
When they change their registration. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #33
All I know is anyone who says "you must do this to be a Democrat" is full of crap quinnox Jun 2014 #36
Mistake #1 is trying to define what a Democrat is Gman Jun 2014 #38
Not voting for Democrats BainsBane Jun 2014 #39
So the NJ Democratic leadership who endorsed Christie... MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #42
At what point Jeff Rosenzweig Jun 2014 #44
Probably not until I take my dirt nap. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #46
I wouldn't look forward to that, personally. Jeff Rosenzweig Jun 2014 #53
Seems like there hasn't been a propitious time for 30 years MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #58
After the midterms four years ago was a very propitious time. Jeff Rosenzweig Jun 2014 #60
Four posts and Manny is already getting to you? bluesbassman Jun 2014 #47
You'll find my old journal here Jeff Rosenzweig Jun 2014 #59
I stand corrected and apologize for the jibe. bluesbassman Jun 2014 #61
I appreciate your kindness. Jeff Rosenzweig Jun 2014 #62
Hey Jeff! Number23 Jun 2014 #67
Jeff if you PM Skinner or Earlg Puglover Jun 2014 #71
When they register as something other than a democrat. LostOne4Ever Jun 2014 #49
The moment they reject 51% of the platform. joshcryer Jun 2014 #50
I'd say when you sell yourself out to the oil industry and Wall Street. Cleita Jun 2014 #54
Took 54 posts but somebody finally got it right tularetom Jun 2014 #56
Giving or not giving speeches to Goldmann-Sachs does or does not make one a Democrat. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #101
Well, it sort of works like this tularetom Jun 2014 #102
Watch your language here and get past the name calling. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #103
Watch my language and get past the name calling? tularetom Jun 2014 #105
The name calling is over the top. Your actions judge you. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #108
Why did I know.... bobGandolf Jun 2014 #68
+1 Scuba Jun 2014 #70
They were also the party of segregation and mostly anti-choice Hippo_Tron Jun 2014 #109
That was and is unfortunately in the South. Cleita Jun 2014 #110
Abortion prevents us from being competitive in a lot of western states we used to compete in Hippo_Tron Jun 2014 #113
They need to be informed, which means we need to get our media Cleita Jun 2014 #115
No question about that, many don't even have an internet connection Hippo_Tron Jun 2014 #121
DU would be a ghost town Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2014 #65
Obviously when they ask whistler162 Jun 2014 #72
Tough Question... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #73
Doesn't lend itself to a crystal clear answer, but... Tom Rinaldo Jun 2014 #74
And, Jane Hamsher and FDL were roundly trashed for it.... KoKo Jun 2014 #83
When you say they are not treestar Jun 2014 #75
Beat me by about 2 minutes. JoePhilly Jun 2014 #76
So if we refuse to recognize those who want to bring back slavery, MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #80
There is a shortage of straw in your area treestar Jun 2014 #99
Oh, a mind reader! MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #100
That depends on who is asking. MineralMan Jun 2014 #78
A long history of being a Republican and supporting some of the most deadly ignorant policies Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #79
Why are you in favor of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #81
You'll have to do better than that, Manny. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #84
Again: why do you embrace the Iraq and Afghanistan wars? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #85
Your disregard for history and your snarky replies to extremely serious questions define you. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #88
If you voted for John Kerry, then you favor the Iraq and Afghanistan war, no? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #89
When did your question to me transition to an attack on me? I'm not standing for office. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #90
I'm dealing just fine with the responses, I think. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #112
At this point it's mainly a color war to make you think there are two sides. polichick Jun 2014 #82
Modern Democrats are a powerful force for the economic Status Quo. Romulox Jun 2014 #86
the Democratic National Platform... LanternWaste Jun 2014 #87
I remember when 'color war' meant something else bigtree Jun 2014 #92
Manny I'm wearing the blue bandanna nilesobek Jun 2014 #93
When they vote for Reagan.... Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #94
It would be easier to mark the point at which they cease to be the left. Marr Jun 2014 #95
When I see a person promote the idea that an anti choice, anti gay activist should be the pattern Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #97
If you self-identify as a Democrat... yallerdawg Jun 2014 #98
They can get your vote that way. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #116
A better way to phrase the OP: Maedhros Jun 2014 #104
Actually, that wasn't what I meant. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #111
According to many people, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #114
Do you happen to have a link for that polling on young people? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #118
Firefox is acting up on me, but do this google search. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #119
This gets me angry as hell MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #120
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At what point is a self-p...»Reply #91