General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey "some" men of DU [View all]JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)I, and most pundits that have offered an opinion, believe this decision has wide ranging consequences that bound past gender lines. Even Justice Sotomier, in her dissent, outlined how it can be applied universally in the near future. Just today, it was reported that some companies are inquiring if their religious views can now be used to avoid upcoming regulations on hiring from the LGBT community.
This decision is a broad brush gift to corporations that want to avoid government requirements that provide expensive health care to employees, not just an assault against women. Insisting that the Roberts court is out to get you for being born a woman seems a bit self centered. Frankly, your vagina takes a distant back seat to corporate financial interests when it comes to this Supreme Court.
If calling me names strengthens your baseless argument that the court just hates women, then knock yourself out. I refuse to reiterate for the sake of giving you opportunity to employ clever emojis.