Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Willful Ignorance on Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party Foreign Policy [View all]wyldwolf
(43,865 posts)24. that's a valid opinion
Despite the fact 'liberal' HAS been applied to foreign policy for at least 100 years, your post is a good example of a discussion some may feel needs to be had.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Willful Ignorance on Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party Foreign Policy [View all]
wyldwolf
Aug 2014
OP
You obviously took the time to make a thoughtful, well-written and researched OP.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#4
At the time this vote occurred she was Senator from NY, over 3000 died in the WTC.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#18
I never said Hillary was the decider, more than half of the Democrats from NY voted
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#21
I asked you before in another set of threads when you pulled out 'liberal internationalism'...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#7
#1. I didn't ask you. #2. It isn't my definition. Reading is fundamental, Manny. Try to keep up.
wyldwolf
Aug 2014
#17
Not only skeptical but impatient. Interventionism is just plain taking too long
eridani
Aug 2014
#41
Apart from Rick Perry, has anyone said US ground troops should go in?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2014
#39
Sure FDR, Truman and Kennedy may have believed in liberal internationalism but that
pampango
Aug 2014
#40
The ideology behind the Vietnam War and the Iraq War might not be one worth keeping.
Chathamization
Aug 2014
#42