Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
12. Absolutely. I agree.
Thu Dec 22, 2011, 01:44 AM
Dec 2011

It is unknown to what degree more effective measures were even considered, but assuming that the WH did not ask for things they knew wouldn't pass then to some degree a calculation was made that the downside of appearing weak was greater than the upside of being right and advancing the possibility of enhanced power/efficacy down the road.

This is why I lean toward believeing they honestly didn't get it. If they knew (as they should have known) that unemployment was going to go up a lot then it seems poltical malpractice to accept that inevitability quietly.

If you know it will happen and you are unable to prvent it then you would want to say, "Pass X or else Y." And then when Y happens at least you called it. And maybe then people rally to you. (Like they rallied to Churchill because he was famous for criticizing Chamberlain and warning abut the Nazis, despite not having had the power to implement what he thought.)

That's why I suspect they really didn't know. It all makes no political sense if they knew. And I KNOW that Obama is a good politician.

It is entirely possible that politicians, as a global class, were unable to understand what was obvious to others.

He SUCKS! Why don't you provide how bad he's doing, with links? I know you have them. babylonsister Dec 2011 #1
Your metrics focus on direction cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #2
Your point is well taken, but MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #3
I still blame direction on wages on Reagan cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #17
The smartest guy would have still had to wait for legislation to sign right? BootinUp Dec 2011 #4
A leader's job is to lead. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #5
Its not a one sided equation. nt BootinUp Dec 2011 #7
There are three branches of government. jaxx Dec 2011 #8
You're right. That's why I won't be volunteering for Obama this time around... ClassWarrior Dec 2011 #11
That's your choice. jaxx Dec 2011 #13
Yes, but the WH (Biden, Carney, Obama himself) have said they didn't get it cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #6
I think that putting things on the table is still a political calculation. nt BootinUp Dec 2011 #9
Absolutely. I agree. cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #12
Its not really a question of being right. BootinUp Dec 2011 #15
Or, veto. Like he said he would veto the NDAA....oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #10
I think those are bad measures hfojvt Dec 2011 #14
As far as median income goes, it would be a better gauge in certain situations. Selatius Dec 2011 #16
Don't forget that he also cut Social Security by 22%...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #18
Obama only called for cuts to SS MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #20
Remember context: financial collapse was best opportunity for Dems in 70 years kenny blankenship Dec 2011 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama: measurements that ...»Reply #12