Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
19. Remember context: financial collapse was best opportunity for Dems in 70 years
Thu Dec 22, 2011, 12:53 PM
Dec 2011

Last edited Thu Dec 22, 2011, 02:28 PM - Edit history (2)

By 2008, thanks to a tide of corruption scandals, a pair of unnecessary and disastrous wars dragging out and going sour for America, and also thanks epic tax cutting profligacy and banking fraud bringing on the total collapse of the financial system, it was at last in the power of the Democratic Party to rescind the Reagan Revolution and to convert the deep & wide discontent in this country into a new legislative & ideological landscape. Under the historical leadership of Barack Obama, they blew it completely, and sold out a chance the likes of which occurs only once in maybe 3 generations, like some crackhead pawning their family's heirloom jewelry for just enough dollars to stay high for a week. 70-75 years is a long time to wait for change, but that's about the interval between major changes in direction in this country's political history. That's about the interval from ratification of the Constitution to the beginning of the Civil War, and then from the Civil War to the New Deal, and from the New Deal to the crisis of 2008.

For 30+ years following the election of Ronald Reagan, Democrats have been promising they would govern for the ordinary people, in the tradition of their party, instead of catering to the rich as the Republicans do. In the atmosphere of general collapse prevailing in 2008, they'd been given the best chance they could ever ask for. It was up to them to deliver their voting constituencies from the predatory grasp of the Reagan (counter)Revolution. Obama and his party failed utterly. Delivering on Democratic Party rhetoric conflicted with their present source of income, and they punted. You must judge his failures against this background - against those stakes. Historians will.

So you ask for some numbers to judge the Obama years by, and I'll say the only ones of real interest are 75 and 30. Did Obama herald change and declare the end of the discredited Reagan Revolution, or did he thwart generational change and restore the Reagan Revolution's robber baron ascendancy?

He SUCKS! Why don't you provide how bad he's doing, with links? I know you have them. babylonsister Dec 2011 #1
Your metrics focus on direction cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #2
Your point is well taken, but MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #3
I still blame direction on wages on Reagan cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #17
The smartest guy would have still had to wait for legislation to sign right? BootinUp Dec 2011 #4
A leader's job is to lead. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #5
Its not a one sided equation. nt BootinUp Dec 2011 #7
There are three branches of government. jaxx Dec 2011 #8
You're right. That's why I won't be volunteering for Obama this time around... ClassWarrior Dec 2011 #11
That's your choice. jaxx Dec 2011 #13
Yes, but the WH (Biden, Carney, Obama himself) have said they didn't get it cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #6
I think that putting things on the table is still a political calculation. nt BootinUp Dec 2011 #9
Absolutely. I agree. cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #12
Its not really a question of being right. BootinUp Dec 2011 #15
Or, veto. Like he said he would veto the NDAA....oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #10
I think those are bad measures hfojvt Dec 2011 #14
As far as median income goes, it would be a better gauge in certain situations. Selatius Dec 2011 #16
Don't forget that he also cut Social Security by 22%...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #18
Obama only called for cuts to SS MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #20
Remember context: financial collapse was best opportunity for Dems in 70 years kenny blankenship Dec 2011 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama: measurements that ...»Reply #19