Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 05:22 AM Nov 2014

"California City Bans Homeless From Sleeping Outside: If They Leave, ‘Then That’s Their Choice’" [View all]

Last week, the city council of Manteca, CA unanimously passed two ordinances aimed at clearing out the homeless population.

One will ban people from sleeping or setting up encampments on any public or private property as of December 4, although the homeless won’t be jailed or fined. It will, however, allow the police to tear down any homeless sleeping areas as soon as they appear without having to be invited by the property owner, as was the case previously.

Explaining why the ordinance is necessary, Police Chief Nick Obligacion said, “The goal is actually to correct the wrong. So, if the correction is them leaving Manteca, then that’s their choice.” He also opposes any sort of shelter for the homeless.

The other ordinance bans public urination and defecation, but also comes after the city temporarily closed public
restrooms in a park, a location often used by the homeless to relieve themselves in private.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/11/10/3590672/manteca-homeless/

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Absolutely shameful! silverweb Nov 2014 #1
Unless you have UglyGreed Nov 2014 #2
Sadly, that seems to be very much the case. silverweb Nov 2014 #4
LOL! Shankapotomus Nov 2014 #3
Because he is FOR the homeless leaving his town! jmowreader Nov 2014 #5
Downright evil newfie11 Nov 2014 #6
Why don't they round them up and send them to the gas chambers? Enthusiast Nov 2014 #7
I have said the same UglyGreed Nov 2014 #8
Yeah. We are all useless eaters on one level or another. Or, we will become such. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #9
We have had 16 years of Democratic Presidents yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #10
That was the main UglyGreed Nov 2014 #11
not by half reddread Nov 2014 #12
It is like a plague UglyGreed Nov 2014 #13
the twin sisters of true terror reddread Nov 2014 #14
San Joaquin County isn't liberal. That's where Manteca is. JRLeft Nov 2014 #18
I understand now thank you N/T UglyGreed Nov 2014 #21
Don't think they wouldn't if they could, but they don't NEED to anymore hifiguy Nov 2014 #16
You pretty much nailed it. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #19
Wow nice post UglyGreed Nov 2014 #20
Thank you for your kind words. hifiguy Nov 2014 #23
..... madfloridian Nov 2014 #24
please post this as an OP elehhhhna Nov 2014 #26
Since I have been asked so nicely, I will hifiguy Nov 2014 #27
Recommend.. KoKo Nov 2014 #28
For those interested, this has been expanded and reposted at hifiguy Nov 2014 #29
Gosh, I love my Blue state KamaAina Nov 2014 #15
Ah, Manstinka. Xithras Nov 2014 #17
How Dare They Sparhawk60 Nov 2014 #22
This is what happens when you localize addressing poverty (States Rights write small) daredtowork Nov 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"California City Ban...