Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The electoral college- the greatest vote suppressor ever [View all]KMOD
(7,906 posts)31. Safe states, and swing states aren't static.
They change over time. California at one point was red, and Texas was blue. Swing states, with the exception of Ohio (which seems to be a perpetual swing state) change as well.
A popular vote would have Presidential candidates only visiting the large cities, (NY, LA, Chicago, etc.) and all other places, would be virtually ignored.
This also serves as a reminder of why the midterms matter. If people want their vote to count, they need to vote in the midterms, so their state and local politicians, who serve as their electorate, represent what they want. That representation helps give their communities and state their voice. That voice, will be the loudest during the Presidential elections.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I think that many here might be unpleasantly surprised by a popular vote system
Nye Bevan
Nov 2014
#1
congressional districts should have a maximum allowed in any one district
wilt the stilt
Nov 2014
#5